首页> 外文期刊>Clinical breast cancer >Sentinel lymph node biopsy in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: Are we overtreating? Experience at a tertiary care hospital
【24h】

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: Are we overtreating? Experience at a tertiary care hospital

机译:对侧预防性乳房切除术中的前哨淋巴结活检:我们过度治疗了吗?在三级医院的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study determined the frequency of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) and evaluated its utility in 170 patients at a community hospital. 21.8% of these had SLNB; no positive nodes were detected. Only three patients had findings on final pathology that would have justified axillary staging. Because SLNB is associated with significant morbidity, guidelines need to be established to avoid over treatment. Objective: Use of routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is controversial. This retrospective study was undertaken to determine the frequency of SLNB in CPM at a community hospital and its utility as a guide to patient decision making. Methods: Between 2007 and 2009, 170 patients underwent CPM at a suburban, tertiary care facility. The CPM was either immediate or delayed, or was for ipsilateral recurrent breast cancer. Thirty-seven (21.8%) of 170 patients had SLNB performed with CPM. The mastectomy specimens underwent standard pathologic evaluation by using intraoperative touch preparation cytology and postoperative hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. Results: No patients who underwent SLNB had positive nodes on touch preparation or final hematoxylin and eosin staining (0/37 [0%]). Fourteen (8.2%) of 37 patients had additional nodes identified in the specimens. These were either axillary tail or intramammary nodes. The median number of SLNs removed was 2 (range, 1-5), none of these were positive. There were 3 incidental cancers diagnosed on final pathology. Two invasive cancers (T1a and grade I) and 1 ductal carcinoma in situ were identified. SLNB was only performed on the patient with DCIS. Neither SLNB nor subsequent axillary lymph node dissection was performed in the invasive cancers. Conclusions: SLNB was performed in 37 (21.8%) of patients who underwent CPM in a community hospital. Only 3 (1.76%) of 170 patients who underwent CPM had findings on final pathology that would have justified axillary staging. This correlates with other published data regarding SLNB in CPM. Because SLNB is associated with significant morbidity, guidelines for SLNB in prophylactic mastectomy need to be established so to avoid overtreatment.
机译:这项研究确定了对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)中前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的频率,并评估了其在社区医院对170例患者的效用。其中21.8%患有SLNB;未检测到阳性结节。只有三名患者在最终病理学上发现了可以证实腋窝分期的证据。由于SLNB与明显的发病率相关,因此需要建立指导原则以避免过度治疗。目的:在对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)中使用常规前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是有争议的。进行了这项回顾性研究,以确定社区医院CPM中SLNB的频率及其作为患者决策的指南。方法:在2007年至2009年之间,有170名患者在郊区的三级医疗机构接受了CPM。 CPM立即或延迟,或用于同侧复发性乳腺癌。 170例患者中有37例(21.8%)通过CPM进行了SLNB。通过术中触摸准备细胞学,术后苏木精和曙红染色以及免疫组织化学对乳房切除术标本进行标准病理评估。结果:接受SLNB的患者在触摸准备或最终苏木精和曙红染色中均未发现阳性淋巴结(0/37 [0%])。 37名患者中有14名(8.2%)在标本中发现了其他结节。这些是腋尾或乳腺内淋巴结。去除的SLN的中位数为2(范围为1-5),所有这些均为阳性。在最终病理学中诊断出3种附带癌症。确定了两个浸润性癌(T1a和I级)和1个原位导管癌。 SLNB仅对DCIS患者进行。在浸润性癌症中,既未进行SLNB手术也未进行腋窝淋巴结清扫术。结论:在社区医院接受CPM的37例患者中进行了SLNB(21.8%)。在接受CPM的170例患者中,只有3例(1.76%)的最终病理发现可以证实腋窝分期。这与CPM中有关SLNB的其他已发布数据相关。由于SLNB与明显的发病率相关,因此需要制定预防性乳房切除术中SLNB的指南,以避免过度治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号