首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Assessment of care by breast cancer patients participating or not participating in a randomized controlled trial: a report with the Patients' Committee for Clinical Trials of the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
【24h】

Assessment of care by breast cancer patients participating or not participating in a randomized controlled trial: a report with the Patients' Committee for Clinical Trials of the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.

机译:参加或不参加随机对照试验的乳腺癌患者的护理评估:国家法定对照患者临床试验委员会的报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been found to have better clinical outcomes than other patients. Our objective was to assess the impact of RCTs on patients' satisfaction with care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in a cohort of women with breast cancer (N = 455) divided into those invited to participate in an RCT (201 acceptances, 66 refusals) and a comparable control group not invited to participate (n = 188). All the patients underwent the same treatment (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 for six cycles). One and 7 months after the beginning of chemotherapy, self-administered satisfaction scores were used to compare the women's assessment of their care (Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care validated scale). RESULTS: At the beginning of chemotherapy, women to whom RCT had been proposed rated the doctors' availability (average +/- standard deviation [SD]: RCT acceptance group, 3.60 +/- 0.78; RCT refusal group, 3.68 +/- 0.87; control group, 3.41 +/- 0.82; P < or = .02) and the doctors' communication (average +/- SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.56 +/- 0.88; RCT refusal group, 3.67 +/- 0.88; control group, 3.39 +/- 0.84; P .05) higher than those to whom the trial was not proposed. After the treatment, participants in the RCT felt that their doctor was more supportive (average +/- SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.04 +/- 0.92; control group, 2.77 +/- 0.85; P = .005) and more informative about their illness and treatment (average +/- SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.34 +/- 0.88; control group, 3.08 +/- 0.92; P = .006) than those in the control group. The general level of satisfaction was also higher in the RCT acceptance group. CONCLUSION: Women participating in an RCT have a more positive picture of their doctors' care than others, probably because of the structural effects of the informed consent and data collection processes.
机译:目的:尚未发现参加随机对照试验(RCT)的癌症患者比其他患者有更好的临床结果。我们的目标是评估RCT对患者对护理满意度的影响。患者与方法:前瞻性研究针对一组乳腺癌女性(N = 455)进行了研究,分为受邀参加RCT的女性(201名接受治疗,66项拒绝)和未邀请参加对照的对照组(n = 188)。所有患者均接受相同的治疗(氟尿嘧啶,表柔比星和环磷酰胺100 mg / m2,共六个周期)。化疗开始后的一个月和七个月,使用自我管理的满意度评分来比较妇女的护理评估(对护理满意度的综合评估验证量表)。结果:在化疗开始时,建议接受RCT的女性对医生的可获得性进行了评估(平均+/-标准差[SD]:RCT接受组为3.60 +/- 0.78; RCT拒绝组为3.68 +/- 0.87 ;对照组:3.41 +/- 0.82; P <或= .02)和医生的交流(平均+/- SD:RCT接受组,3.56 +/- 0.88; RCT拒绝组,3.67 +/- 0.88;对照组组,比未提议进行试验的患者高3.39 +/- 0.84; P <0.05)。治疗后,RCT的参与者感到他们的医生更支持(平均+/- SD:RCT接受组,3.04 +/- 0.92;对照组,2.77 +/- 0.85; P = .005),并且对他们的疾病和治疗(平均+/- SD:RCT接受组,3.34 +/- 0.88;对照组,3.08 +/- 0.92; P = 0.006)高于对照组。 RCT接受组的总体满意度也较高。结论:参加RCT的女性比其他女性对医生的护理更为积极,这可能是由于知情同意和数据收集过程的结构性影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号