首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia.
【24h】

Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia.

机译:与传统护理方案相比,阿扎胞苷可降低骨髓原细胞计数低的急性髓细胞性白血病的老年患者的总生存期。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: In a phase III randomized trial, azacitidine significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with conventional care regimens (CCRs) in patients with intermediate-2- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Approximately one third of these patients were classified as having acute myeloid leukemia (AML) under current WHO criteria. This analysis compared the effects of azacitidine versus CCR on OS in this subgroup. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m(2)/d or CCR (best supportive care [BSC] only, low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), or intensive chemotherapy [IC]). RESULTS: Of the 113 elderly patients (median age, 70 years) randomly assigned to receive azacitidine (n = 55) or CCR (n = 58; 47% BSC, 34% LDAC, 19% IC), 86% were considered unfit for IC. At a median follow-up of 20.1 months, median OS for azacitidine-treated patients was 24.5 months compared with 16.0 months for CCR-treated patients (hazard ratio = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.79; P = .005), and 2-year OS rates were 50% and 16%, respectively (P = .001). Two-year OS rates were higher with azacitidine versus CCR in patients considered unfit for IC (P = .0003). Azacitidine was associated with fewer total days in hospital (P < .0001) than CCR. CONCLUSION: In older adult patients with low marrow blast count (20% to 30%) WHO-defined AML, azacitidine significantly prolongs OS and significantly improves several patient morbidity measures compared with CCR.
机译:目的:在一项III期随机试验中,与传统护理方案(CCR)相比,阿扎胞苷可显着延长中度和高危2型和高危骨髓增生异常综合征患者的总生存期(OS)。根据当前的WHO标准,这些患者中约有三分之一被分类为患有急性髓细胞性白血病(AML)。该分析比较了阿扎胞苷和CCR对该亚组OS的影响。患者与方法:患者被随机分配接受皮下注射阿扎胞苷75 mg / m(2)/ d或CCR(仅最佳支持治疗[BSC],低剂量阿糖胞苷(LDAC)或强化化疗[IC])。结果:在113位随机分配接受阿扎胞苷(n = 55)或CCR(n = 58; 47%BSC,34%LDAC,19%IC)的老年患者(中位年龄为70岁)中,有86%被认为不适合我知道了。在中位随访20.1个月时,用阿扎胞苷治疗的患者的中位OS为24.5个月,而接受CCR治疗的患者的中位OS为16.0个月(危险比= 0.47; 95%CI为0.28至0.79; P = 0.005),并且2年OS发生率分别为50%和16%(P = .001)。对于认为不适合IC的患者,阿扎胞苷的两年OS率高于CCR(P = .0003)。与CCR相比,阿扎胞苷在医院的总住院天数较少(P <.0001)。结论:与CCR相比,在骨髓原细胞计数低(20%至30%)的WHO定义的AML成年患者中,阿扎胞苷显着延长了OS并显着改善了几例患者的发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号