首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized trial of single compared with tandem high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer.
【24h】

Randomized trial of single compared with tandem high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer.

机译:对化疗敏感的转移性乳腺癌患者进行单剂量与串联大剂量化疗然后自体干细胞移植的比较的随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare progression-free survival between single and tandem high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1997 and June 2001, 187 patients with complete and partial remission were randomly assigned to receive either one or two cycles of HDT, consisting of thiotepa (125 mg/m2/d for 4 days), cyclophosphamide (1,500 mg/m2/d for 4 days), and carboplatin (200 mg/m2/d for 4 days), followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation. RESULTS: One hundred seventy one of 187 randomly assigned patients completed first HDT, but only 52 of 85 completed the second HDT cycle in the tandem HDT arm. The rate of complete remission on an intent-to-treat-basis was 33% in the single-dose HDT arm and 37% in the tandem HDT arm (P = .48). The median progression-free survival times in single and tandem HDT arms were 9.4 and 11.2 months, respectively (one-sided P = .06; two one-sided P = .12), whereas median overall survival time tended to be greater after single versus tandem HDT (29 v 23.5 months, respectively; P = .4). In a multivariate analysis for progression-free survival, tandem HDT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.98; P = .03) and achievement of complete remission after induction chemotherapy (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.96; P = .03) were factors for a better progression-free survival, whereas the factor of three or more sites of metastases (HR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.47; P = .01) was associated with a worse progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: Despite a trend of improved progression-free survival, tandem HDT cannot be recommended for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer because of a trend for shorter overall survival and higher toxicity compared with single HDT.
机译:目的:比较在对化疗敏感的转移性乳腺癌患者中,单剂量和串联高剂量化疗(HDT)再进行自体干细胞移植之间的无进展生存期。患者与方法:1997年2月至2001年6月,随机分配187例完全缓解和部分缓解的患者接受一轮或两轮HDT,包括硫替帕(125 mg / m2 / d,持续4天),环磷酰胺(1,500 mg / m2 / d持续4天)和卡铂(200 mg / m2 / d持续4天),然后进行自体干细胞移植。结果:在187名随机分配的患者中,一百七十一名完成了第一次HDT,但在串联的HDT组中,只有85名中的52名完成了第二次HDT周期。意向治疗基础上的完全缓解率在单剂量HDT组为33%,而在串联HDT组为37%(P = 0.48)。单个和串联HDT臂的无进展生存时间中位数分别为9.4和11.2个月(单侧P = .06;两个单侧P = 0.12),而单次使用后,中位总体生存时间倾向于更长与串联HDT相比(分别为29 v 23.5个月; P = 0.4)。在无进展生存期的多变量分析中,串联HDT(危险比[HR] = 0.71; 95%CI,0.52至0.98; P = .03)和诱导化疗后完全缓解(HR = 0.59; 95%CI) ,0.37至0.96; P = .03)是获得更好的无进展生存的因素,而与三个或更多转移部位(HR = 1.66; 95%CI,1.12至2.47; P = .01)相关无进展生存期更差。结论:尽管有无进展生存期改善的趋势,但与单一HDT相比,串联HDT的总体生存期更短,毒性更高,因此不推荐用于化疗敏感性转移性乳腺癌患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号