...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Multicenter randomized phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel, estramustine, and prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
【24h】

Multicenter randomized phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel, estramustine, and prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

机译:多中心紫杉醇,雌莫司汀和泼尼松与米托蒽醌加泼尼松两种方案治疗转移性激素难治性前列腺癌的多中心随机II期研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Mitoxantrone-corticosteroid is currently the standard palliative treatment in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Recent clinical trials documented the high activity of the docetaxel-estramustine combination. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (primary end point) and safety of two docetaxel-estramustine-prednisone (DEP) regimens and mitoxantrone-prednisone (MP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty metastatic HRPC patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 2 or 35 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of each 21-day cycle) and estramustine (280 mg p.o. tid on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12) or mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; all patients received prednisone (10 mg daily). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were assessable for PSA response and safety. A > or = 50% PSA decline was found in a greater percentage of patients in the docetaxel arms (67% and 63%) compared with MP (18%; P = .0001).Median time to PSA progression was five times longer with DEP than with MP (8.8 and 9.3 v 1.7 months, respectively; P = .000001). Overall survival was better in the docetaxel arms (18.6 and 18.4 months) compared with the MP arm (13.4 months), but not significantly so (P = .3). Crossover rates differed significantly among treatment arms (16%, 10%, and 48% in arms A, B, and C, respectively; P = .00001). Treatment-related toxicities were mild and mainly hematologic. CONCLUSION: The results of this randomized phase II study showed significantly higher PSA decline < or = 50% and longer times to progression in HRPC patients receiving DEP-based chemotherapy than MP, and that DEP could be proposed in this setting.
机译:目的:米托蒽醌-皮质类固醇目前是激素难治性前列腺癌(HRPC)患者的标准姑息治疗方法。最近的临床试验证明多西他赛-雌莫司汀组合具有很高的活性。我们进行了一项随机的II期研究,以评估前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)响应(主要终点)以及两种多西他赛-雌铁-泼尼松(DEP)方案和米托蒽醌-泼尼松(MP)的安全性。患者和方法:一百三十三位转移性HRPC患者被随机分配接受多西他赛(每个疗程21天的第2天为70 mg / m2或第2天和第9天为35 mg / m2)和雌莫司汀(第280天口服)每3周1至5和8至12)或米托蒽醌12 mg / m2;所有患者均接受泼尼松(每天10 mg)。结果:127例患者的PSA反应和安全性得到了评估。与MP(18%; P = .0001)相比,多西他赛组患者的PSA下降幅度≥50%(分别为67%和63%)。 DEP高于MP(分别为8.8和9.3 v 1.7个月; P = .000001)。与MP组(13.4个月)相比,多西他赛组(18.6和18.4个月)的总生存期更好,但并非如此(P = .3)。治疗组之间的交叉率差异显着(A,B和C组分别为16%,10%和48%; P = .00001)。与治疗有关的毒性是轻微的,主要是血液学的。结论:这项II期随机研究的结果表明,接受DEP方案化疗的HRPC患者的PSA下降<或= 50%显着更高,并且进展时间更长,而MP组则可以提出DEP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号