首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computational Chemistry: Organic, Inorganic, Physical, Biological >MOLECULAR ENERGIES AND PROPERTIES FROM DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY - EXPLORING BASIS SET DEPENDENCE OF KOHN-SHAM EQUATION USING SEVERAL DENSITY FUNCTIONALS
【24h】

MOLECULAR ENERGIES AND PROPERTIES FROM DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY - EXPLORING BASIS SET DEPENDENCE OF KOHN-SHAM EQUATION USING SEVERAL DENSITY FUNCTIONALS

机译:密度泛函理论的分子能量和性质-利用几个密度泛函探讨KOHN-Sham方程的基集相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The performance of four commonly used density functionals (VWN, BLYP, BP91, and Becke's original three-parameter approximation to the adiabatic connection formula, referred to herein as the adiabatic connection method or ACM) was studied with a series of six Gaussian-type atomic basis sets [DZP, 6-31G**; DZVP, TZVP, TZ2P, and uncontracted aug-cc-pVTZ (UCC)]. The geometries and dipole moments of over 100 first-row and second-row molecules and reaction energies of over 300 chemical reactions involving such molecules were computed using each of the four density functionals in combination with each of the six basis sets. The results were compared to experimentally determined values. Based on overall mean absolute theory versus experiment errors, it was found that ACM is the best choice for predictions of both energies of reaction [overall mean absolute theory versus experiment error (MATvEE) of 4.7 kcal/mol with our most complete (UCC) basis set] and molecular geometries (overall MATvEE of 0.92 pm for bond distances and 0.88 degrees for bond angles with the UCC basis set). For routine calculations with moderate basis sets (those of double-zeta type: DZP, 6-31G**, and DZVP) the DZVP basis set was, on average, the best choice. There were, however, examples of reactions where significantly larger basis sets were required to achieve reasonable accuracy (errors less than or equal to 5 kcal/mol). For dipole moments, ACM, BP91, and BLYP performed comparably (overall MATvEE of 0.071, 0.067, and 0.059 debye, respectively, with the UCC basis set). Basis sets that include additional polarization functions and diffuse functions were found to be important for accurate density functional theory predictions of dipole moments. (C) 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [References: 86]
机译:使用一系列六个高斯型原子研究了四种常用密度泛函(VWN,BLYP,BP91和Becke绝热连接公式的原始三参数近似值,在本文中称为绝热连接方法或ACM)的性能。基集[DZP,6-31G **; DZVP,TZVP,TZ2P和未签订合同的aug-cc-pVTZ(UCC)]。使用四个密度泛函中的每一个与六个基础集的每一个相结合,计算出了100多个第一行和第二行分子的几何形状和偶极矩,以及涉及此类分子的300多个化学反应的反应能。将结果与实验确定的值进行比较。基于总体平均绝对理论与实验误差,发现ACM是预测两种反应能量的最佳选择[总体上,绝对绝对理论与实验误差(MATvEE)为4.7 kcal / mol。集合]和分子的几何形状(使用UCC基集,整体MATvEE的键距为0.92 pm,键角为0.88度)。对于具有中等基础集(双Zeta类型的那些:DZP,6-31G **和DZVP)的常规计算,平均而言,DZVP基础集是最佳选择。但是,在一些反应示例中,需要大得多的基础集才能达到合理的精度(误差小于或等于5 kcal / mol)。对于偶极矩,ACM,BP91和BLYP的性能相当(以UCC为基准,MATvEE分别为0.071、0.067和0.059 debye)。发现包括附加极化函数和扩散函数的基础集对偶极矩的精确密度泛函理论预测很重要。 (C)1997,John Wiley&Sons,Inc. [参考:86]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号