...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computational Chemistry: Organic, Inorganic, Physical, Biological >Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Commonly Available Density Functionals in the Determination of Geometrical Parameters for Zinc Complexes
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Commonly Available Density Functionals in the Determination of Geometrical Parameters for Zinc Complexes

机译:锌配合物几何参数确定中常用密度泛函性能的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A set of 44 Zinc-ligand bond-lengths and of 60 ligand-metal-ligand bond angles from 10 diverse transition-metal complexes, representative of the coordination spheres of typical biological Zn systems, were used to evaluate the performance of a total of IS commonly available density functionals in geometry determination. Five different basis sets were considered for each density functional, namely two all-electron basis sets (a double-zeta and triple-zeta formulation) and three basis sets including popular types of effective-core potentials: Los Alamos, Steven-Basch-Krauss, and Stuttgart-Dresden. The results show that there are presently several better alternatives to the popular B3LYP density functional for the determination of Zn-ligand bond-lengths and angles. BB1K, MPWB1K, MPW1K, B97-2 and TPSS are suggested as the strongest alternatives for this effect presently available in most Computational chemistry software packages. In addition, the results show that the use of effective-core potentials (in particular Stuttgart-Dresden) has a very limited impact, in terms of accuracy, in the determination of metal-ligand bond-lengths and angles in Zinc-complexes, and is a good and safe alternative to the use of an all-electron basis set such as 6-31G(d) or 6-311G(d,p).
机译:来自10种不同过渡金属配合物的一组44个锌-配体键长和60个配体-金属-配体键角代表了典型的生物Zn系统的配位域,用于评估整个IS的性能。几何确定中常用的密度泛函。对于每种密度泛函,考虑了五个不同的基础集,即两个全电子基础集(一个双Zeta和Triple-Zeta配方)和三个基础集,其中包括流行的有效核心电势类型:Los Alamos,Steven-Basch-Krauss和斯图加特-德累斯顿。结果表明,对于确定Zn-配体键的长度和角度,目前流行的B3LYP密度泛函有几种更好的选择。建议使用BB1K,MPWB1K,MPW1K,B97-2和TPSS作为目前大多数计算化学软件包中可用的最强替代方法。此外,结果表明,在准确性方面,使用有效核心电势(特别是斯图加特-德累斯顿)对确定锌配位化合物中金属配体的键长和角度的影响非常有限。是使用全电子基集(例如6-31G(d)或6-311G(d,p))的一种良好且安全的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号