首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >Differences in the knowledge and compliance with secondary prevention of stroke between transient ischaemic attack patients with and without subsequent stroke
【24h】

Differences in the knowledge and compliance with secondary prevention of stroke between transient ischaemic attack patients with and without subsequent stroke

机译:有和没有后续卒中的短暂性脑缺血发作患者之间对卒中的二级预防知识和依从性的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims and objectives. To evaluate the differences in the knowledge and compliance with secondary prevention of stroke between transient ischaemic attack patients with and without subsequent stroke.Background. No previous study has demonstrated whether there are differences in the knowledge and compliance with secondary prevention of stroke between transient ischaemic attack patients with and without subsequent stroke. If there are differences, the health education regarding the stroke knowledge should be conducted separately and differently for the two groups.Methods and design. We consecutively recruited 355 transient ischaemic attack patients with/without subsequent stroke from our hospital from 1 December 2008-31 December 2011. There were 304 patients receiving health education both upon hospital discharge and 90 days after discharge. Through telephone interviews, six months after discharge, only 180 patients completed the survey to determine in detail their general knowledge and compliance with secondary prevention of stroke.Results. The transient ischaemic attack patients with subsequent stroke exhibited a higher identification rate of speech disorder, weakness and decreased sensation or inability to feel things, compared with those without subsequent stroke (76.1 vs. 66.3%, p < 0.05; 91.5 vs. 73.5%, p < 0.05; 62.2 vs. 46.9%, p < 0.05). The compliance rates to antiplatelet agents and statins therapy were higher in transient ischaemic attack patients with subsequent stroke compared with those without subsequent stroke (80.5 vs. 65.3%, p < 0.05; 53.7 vs. 35.7%, p < 0.05). Conclusions. The transient ischaemic attack patients with subsequent stroke exhibit a higher identification rate of most of the warning signs of stroke and a better compliance with antiplatelet agents and statins therapy of stroke compared with those without subsequent stroke. Thus, we suggest that transient ischaemic attack patients should receive additional health education to increase their awareness of the harms of stroke.Relevance to clinical practice. Clinicians should be aware of conducting different health education to patients with transient ischaemic attack and stroke. Also, it is important to give health education to individualised patients based on their actual risk of stroke.
机译:目的和目标。评估短暂性脑缺血发作患者有无继发性卒中的知识和对卒中二级预防的依从性差异。以前没有研究表明短暂性脑缺血发作患者有或没有继发性卒中,在卒中二级预防方面的知识和依从性是否存在差异。如果存在差异,则应分别对两组进行中风知识的健康教育。方法和设计。从2008年12月1日至2011年12月31日,我们从医院连续招募了355例有/没有随后中风的短暂性脑缺血发作患者。有304例患者在出院后和出院后90天接受了健康教育。通过电话访问,出院后六个月,只有180名患者完成了调查,以详细确定他们的常识和对中风的二级预防的依从性。结果。与未发生中风的患者相比,发生中风的短暂性脑缺血发作患者的言语障碍,虚弱,感觉或无感觉能力下降的识别率更高(76.1 vs. 66.3%,p <0.05; 91.5 vs. 73.5%, p <0.05; 62.2 vs. 46.9%,p <0.05)。继发卒中的短暂性脑缺血发作患者对抗血小板药物和他汀类药物治疗的依从率高于未继发卒中的患者(80.5 vs. 65.3%,p <0.05; 53.7 vs.35.7%,p <0.05)。结论。与未发生中风的患者相比,发生中风的短暂性脑缺血发作患者对大多数中风警告信号的识别率更高,并且对中风的抗血小板药物和他汀类药物治疗依从性更好。因此,我们建议短暂性脑缺血发作患者应接受额外的健康教育,以提高他们对中风危害的认识。与临床实践相关。临床医生应注意对短暂性脑缺血发作和中风患者进行不同的健康教育。同样,根据患者的实际中风风险对他们进行健康教育也很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号