...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >Assessment of nursing management and utilization of nursing resources with the RAFAELA patient classification system - case study from the general wards of one central hospital.
【24h】

Assessment of nursing management and utilization of nursing resources with the RAFAELA patient classification system - case study from the general wards of one central hospital.

机译:使用RAFAELA患者分类系统评估护理管理和护理资源的利用-以一家中央医院的普通病房为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

rainio a-k & ohinmaa ae (2005) Journal of Clinical Nursing14, 674-684 Assessment of nursing management and utilization of nursing resources with the RAFAELA patient classification system - case study from the general wards of one central hospitalBackground. RAFAELA is a new Finnish PCS, which is used in several University Hospitals and Central Hospitals and has aroused considerable interest in hospitals in Europe. Aims and objectives. The aim of the research is firstly to assess the feasibility of the RAFAELA Patient Classification System (PCS) in nursing staff management and, secondly, whether it can be seen as the transferring of nursing resources between wards according to the information received from nursing care intensity classification. Methods. The material was received from the Central Hospital's 12 general wards between 2000 and 2001. The RAFAELA PCS consists of three different measures: a system measuring patient care intensity, a system recording daily nursing resources, and a system measuring the optimal nursing care intensityurse situation. The data were analysed in proportion to the labour costs of nursing work and, from that, we calculated the employer's loss (a situation below the optimal level) and savings (a situation above the optimal level) per ward as both costs and the number of nurses. Results. In 2000 the wards had on average 77 days below the optimal level and 106 days above it. In 2001 the wards had on average 71 days below the optimal level and 129 above it. Converting all these days to monetary and personnel resources the employer lost 307,745 or 9.84 nurses and saved 369,080 or 11.80 nurses in total in 2000. In 2001 the employer lost in total 242,143 or 7.58 nurses and saved 457,615 or 14.32 nurses. During the time period of the research nursing resources seemed not have been transferred between wards. Conclusions. RAFAELA PCS is applicable to the allocation of nursing resources but its possibilities have not been entirely used in the researched hospital. The management of nursing work should actively use the information received in nursing care intensity classification and plan and implement the transferring of nursing resources in order to ensure the quality of patient care. Relevance to clinical practice. Information on which units resources should be allocated to is needed in the planning of staff resources of the whole hospital. More resources do not solve the managerial problem of the right allocation of resources. If resources are placed wrongly, the problems of daily staff management and cost control continue.
机译:Rainio ak&ohinmaa ae(2005)《临床护理杂志》 14,674-684通过RAFAELA患者分类系统评估护理管理和护理资源的利用-一家中央医院总病房的案例研究。 RAFAELA是一种新的芬兰PCS,已在多家大学医院和中央医院中使用,并引起了欧洲医院的极大关注。目的和目标。研究的目的是首先评估RAFAELA患者分类系统(PCS)在护理人员管理中的可行性,其次,根据从护理强度获得的信息,是否可以将其视为病房之间的护理资源转移分类。方法。该材料是在2000年至2001年之间从中央医院的12个普通病房收到的。RAFAELA PCS包含三种不同的衡量标准:测量患者护理强度的系统,记录日常护理资源的系统以及测量最佳护理强度/护士的系统。情况。根据护理工作的人工成本对数据进行分析,然后,我们计算了每个病房的雇主损失(低于最佳水平的情况)和储蓄(高于最佳水平的情况)的成本和数量。护士。结果。在2000年,病房平均比最佳病房低77天,比最佳病房高106天。在2001年,病房平均比最佳病房低71天,比最佳病房高129天。将所有这些天转换为金钱和人力资源后,雇主在2000年共损失307,745名或9.84名护士,挽救了369,080名或11.80名护士。2001年,雇主共损失242,143名或7.58名护士,挽救了457,615名或14.32名护士。在研究期间,护理资源似乎并未在病房之间转移。结论。 RAFAELA PCS适用于护理资源的分配,但其可能性尚未在研究医院中完全使用。护理工作管理人员应积极利用护理强度分类中收到的信息,规划和实施护理资源转移,以确保护理质量。与临床实践有关。在整个医院的人力资源规划中,需要有关应分配给哪个单位资源的信息。更多的资源不能解决资源正确分配的管理问题。如果资源配置不当,日常人员管理和成本控制问题将继续存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号