首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
【24h】

Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.

机译:在闭塞和纱布敷料之间随机分配的外科手术患者局部伤口护理的家庭护理费用比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To study the material and nursing costs and outcome of wound care at home comparing two dressing groups (occlusive vs. gauze-based) in surgical patients after hospital dismissal. BACKGROUND: The large variety in dressing materials and lack of convincing evidence make the choice for optimum local wound care at home cumbersome. Occlusive wound dressings require a lower change frequency than gauze-based dressings, which appears especially useful for homecare patients and could save costs. METHODS: We investigated a consecutive series of 76 patients with wounds, included in a randomized trial comparing occlusive vs. gauze dressings. Daily dressing change frequency, consumption of dressing materials and need for district nursing visits were recorded until wound closure by means of diaries and at outpatient visits. Costs were expressed as means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) after calculation using non-parametric bootstrapping. RESULTS: Patient groups were similar regarding age, woundsize and aetiology. Dressing change frequency in the occlusive group (median: 0.6/day) was significantly (p = 0.008) lower than in the gauze group (1.1/day). Mean daily material costs of modern dressings were euro5.31 vs. euro0.71 in the gauze group. Mean difference; euro4.60 (95% CI, euro2.68-euro6.83) while daily total (material plus nursing) costs showed no difference between the groups; mean euro2.86 (95% CI, euro-6.50-euro10.25). Wound healing in the gauze-treated group tended to be quicker than in the occlusive dressing group (medians: 30 vs. 48 days, respectively; log-rank p = 0.060). CONCLUSIONS: The use of occlusive dressings does not lead to a reduction in costs and wound healing time as compared with gauze dressings for surgical patients receiving wound care at home. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: District nurses should reconsider using gauze-based dressings, particularly in surgical patients with exudating wounds.
机译:目的和目的:比较医院解散后手术患者的两个敷料组(闭塞和纱布),研究在家中的材料和护理费用以及伤口护理的效果。背景:敷料材料种类繁多,缺乏令人信服的证据,使得在家中进行最佳局部伤口护理的选择变得麻烦。与基于纱布的敷料相比,闭塞伤口敷料的更换频率更低,这对于家庭护理患者尤其有用,并且可以节省成本。方法:我们调查了连续的76例有伤口的患者,包括在比较闭塞与纱布敷料的随机试验中。记录每日换药的频率,换药材料的消耗以及对地区护理的访问,直到通过日记和门诊就诊伤口闭合为止。使用非参数自举计算后,成本表示为平均值和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:患者的年龄,伤口大小和病因相似。闭塞组(中位数:0.6 /天)的换药频率比纱布组(1.1 /天)低(p = 0.008)。现代敷料的平均每日材料成本为5.31欧元,纱布组为0.71欧元。平均差; euro4.60(95%CI,euro2.68-euro6.83),而每日总费用(包括材料和护理)在两组之间没有差异;平均欧元2.86(95%CI,欧元6.50-欧元10.25)。纱布治疗组的伤口愈合倾向于比闭塞敷料组更快(中位数分别为30天和48天;对数秩p = 0.060)。结论:与在家中接受伤口护理的手术患者使用纱布敷料相比,使用闭塞敷料不会导致成本和伤口愈合时间的减少。与临床实践的关系:地区护士应重新考虑使用纱布为基础的敷料,尤其是对于有渗出伤口的手术患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号