...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia >Patient satisfaction and radiographic outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion without iliac crest bone graft or transverse process fusion.
【24h】

Patient satisfaction and radiographic outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion without iliac crest bone graft or transverse process fusion.

机译:没有without骨骨移植或横突融合的腰椎融合术后的患者满意度和影像学结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold standard for promoting bony fusion of the spine. However, harvest-site infection and pain are two of the most significant drawbacks of using iliac crest autograft in spinal fusion procedures. The rationale for its continued use, despite these drawbacks, has been based on the relatively higher rate of fusion reported in the literature. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether modern allograft and fusion-promoting materials combined with local bone graft results in acceptable fusion rates and patient satisfaction. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, surgical, and radiographic records of 200 consecutive patients with symptomatic degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine who underwent non-revision fusion using local bone graft combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 with or without allograft. Rates of radiographic fusion and patient satisfaction were analyzed at discharge, 6 months, and 12 months, and every year thereafter. Mean follow-up was 32 months. Fusion was performed across an average of 2.5 levels and the overall fusion rate was 97%. In patients undergoing posterior fixation only there was a 5% incidence of pseudarthrosis, while the incidence was only 0.5% for patients undergoing circumferential fixation. Overall patient satisfaction at discharge was good to excellent in over 90% of patients and did not significantly change at the 6 month, 12 month and 24 month follow-up. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in rates of spinal fusion using laminectomy bone autograft combined with rhBMP-2 with or without allograft, compared to historical controls using ICBG. Fusion rates may be further improved with the use of circumferential fixation. Patient satisfaction remained high and might be because the morbidity associated with harvesting ICBG was avoided, as was the additional muscle dissection required for the fusion of lateral transverse processes.
机译:lia骨植骨(ICBG)仍然是促进脊柱骨融合的金标准。但是,收获部位的感染和疼痛是在脊柱融合手术中使用自体移植的两个最明显的缺点。尽管有这些缺点,其继续使用的基本原理是基于文献中报道的相对较高的融合率。因此,本研究的目的是确定现代同种异体移植和融合促进材料与局部骨移植相结合是否能导致可接受的融合率和患者满意度。我们回顾性回顾了200例连续的腰椎症状性退行性疾病的患者的临床,外科和影像学记录,这些患者均采用局部植骨结合重组人骨形态发生蛋白(rhBMP)-2进行同种异体移植或不进行同种异体移植进行了非修订融合。在出院,6个月和12个月以及此后的每年分析放射影像融合率和患者满意度。平均随访32个月。融合平均进行2.5级,总融合率为97%。在进行后路固定的患者中,假关节病的发生率仅为5%,而进行周向固定的患者的发生率仅为0.5%。超过90%的患者对出院的总体满意度令人满意,甚至在6个月,12个月和24个月的随访中没有明显变化。总之,与使用ICBG的历史对照相比,使用椎板切除术自体骨移植结合有或没有同种异体移植的rhBMP-2进行的脊柱融合率没有显着差异。通过使用圆周固定可以进一步提高融合率。患者满意度仍然很高,这可能是因为避免了与收获ICBG相关的发病率,以及横向横突融合所需的额外肌肉解剖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号