首页> 外文期刊>Clinical biomechanics >A method to calculate the centre of the ankle joint: a comparison with the Vicon Plug-in-Gait model.
【24h】

A method to calculate the centre of the ankle joint: a comparison with the Vicon Plug-in-Gait model.

机译:一种计算踝关节中心的方法:与Vicon插入式步态模型进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In gait analysis, calculation of the ankle joint centre is a difficult task. The conventional way to calculate the ankle joint centre is using the Vicon Plug-in-Gait model. The present study proposes a new model, which calculates the joint centre from two markers positioned over the medial and lateral malleoli (i.e. Two-marker-model). METHODS: In order to compare the proposed model with Plug-in-Gait model, gait data from healthy and patient subjects were captured using a motion capture system. The ankle joint centres were calculated by the two models. A test-retest experiment was carried out to check reliability and repeatability for Two-marker-model. FINDINGS: Two ankle joint centres produced by two models were significantly different. The distances between two ankle joint centres were approximately 16.8 (mm), and the differences in the posterior-anterior, medial-lateral and inferior-superior directions were approximately 6.3, 7.7 and 8.2 (mm). Further error analysis highlighted that the probability of producing errors in Two-marker-model is lower than that in Plug-in-Gait model due to the Two-marker-model's simple and reliable marker positioning. The reliability and repeatability coefficients for the new model were greater than 0.9. INTERPRETATION: In principle, the Plug-in-Gait model is more likely to produce errors than the Two-marker-model, because the former employs multiple markers from the pelvis to calf to define the ankle joint centre with marker positions being very user-dependent. The results suggest that the Two-marker-model can be considered an alternative to Plug-in-Gait model for calculating ankle joint centre.
机译:背景:在步态分析中,踝关节中心的计算是一项艰巨的任务。计算踝关节中心的常规方法是使用Vicon插入式步态模型。本研究提出了一种新模型,该模型可以根据位于内侧和外侧槌骨上的两个标记(即两个标记模型)来计算关节中心。方法:为了将拟议的模型与“步态插入”模型进行比较,使用运动捕获系统捕获了健康受试者和患者的步态数据。踝关节中心由两个模型计算。进行了重新测试实验,以检查两个标记模型的可靠性和可重复性。结果:两个模型产生的两个踝关节中心明显不同。两个脚踝关节中心之间的距离约为16.8(mm),前后,内侧,外侧和上下方向的差异约为6.3、7.7和8.2(mm)。进一步的误差分析表明,由于两个标记模型的标记定位简单可靠,因此在两个标记模型中产生错误的可能性要比在即插即用模型中产生误差的可能性低。新模型的可靠性和重复性系数大于0.9。解释:原则上,“步态插入”模型比“双标记”模型更容易产生错误,因为前者采用从骨盆到小腿的多个标记来定义踝关节中心,标记位置非常用户-依赖。结果表明,双标记模型可以被认为是替代步态即插即用模型计算踝关节中心的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号