首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology >How salient is the silent period? The role of the silent period in the prognosis of upper extremity motor recovery after severe stroke.
【24h】

How salient is the silent period? The role of the silent period in the prognosis of upper extremity motor recovery after severe stroke.

机译:沉默期有多重要?沉默期在重度卒中后在上肢运动恢复预后中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been successful in the prediction of motor recovery in acute stroke patients with initially severe paresis or paralysis of the upper extremity. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) appear to have a high specificity but a rather low sensitivity with regard to motor recovery. The silent period (SP) has been proposed as an additional factor to the MEP for predicting motor recovery that might optimize the sensitivity of TMS. The authors reviewed the literature and case series focusing on the additional value of the SP to the MEP for predicting poststroke hand motor recovery. Studies that have analyzed the SP for predicting poststroke motor recovery have rather inconsistent results and suffer from heterogeneity in technical methods, methodology, and patient characteristics. In most studies, prolonged SPs have been found immediately after stroke, whereas in the (sub)acute phase thereafter, different patterns of SP duration have been found. These differences are thought tobe related to stroke localization, though contraction-induced reduction phenomena and recovery-related intracortical phenomena may also be responsible. Although the SP might be used to identify clinically silent or minor strokes, in acute stroke patients with initial severe paresis or paralysis, the SP seems to have no additional value to MEP for predicting poststroke motor recovery. Nevertheless, the SP (poststroke-reduced SPs and contraction-induced inhibitory phenomena) has been proposed as a prognostic factor for poststroke spasticity. This review emphasizes the significance of the SP in predicting poststroke motor recovery and spasticity. Although the relation among the SP, recovery-related intracortical phenomena, and spasticity remains unclear, a neurophysiologic model underlying the SP is discussed. However, more research is needed on the value of the SP for predicting poststroke spasticity.
机译:经颅磁刺激(TMS)已成功地预测了最初患有严重轻瘫或上肢麻痹的急性中风患者的运动恢复。运动诱发电位(MEP)在运动恢复方面似乎具有很高的特异性,但敏感性却很低。静默期(SP)已被提议作为MEP的附加因素,用于预测可能会优化TMS灵敏度的运动恢复。作者回顾了有关SP对MEP的附加价值以预测中风后手部运动恢复的文献和病例系列。分析SP预测卒中后运动恢复的研究结果不一致,并且在技术方法,方法和患者特征方面存在异质性。在大多数研究中,中风后立即发现了较长的SP,而在此后的(亚)急性期,发现了不同的SP持续时间模式。这些差异被认为与卒中的局限性有关,尽管收缩引起的减少现象和恢复相关的皮层内现象也可能是原因。尽管SP可能被用于识别临床上无声或轻度的中风,但在最初出现严重轻瘫或瘫痪的急性中风患者中,SP对于MEP预测卒中后运动恢复似乎没有任何附加价值。然而,SP(中风后降低的SPs和收缩引起的抑制现象)已被提议作为中风后痉挛的预后因素。这篇综述强调了SP在预测中风后运动恢复和痉挛中的重要性。尽管尚不清楚SP,恢复相关的皮层内现象和痉挛之间的关系,但仍讨论了SP背后的神经生理模型。但是,需要更多的关于SP预测卒中后痉挛的价值的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号