...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology >Yield of the sural/radial ratio versus the medial plantar nerve in sensory neuropathies with a normal sural response.
【24h】

Yield of the sural/radial ratio versus the medial plantar nerve in sensory neuropathies with a normal sural response.

机译:在正常的腓肠神经反应的感觉神经病中,腓肠神经/ radi神经径与al神经内侧的比率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The electrodiagnostic yield of the medial plantar nerve action potential (NAP) amplitude versus the sural/radial amplitude ratio (SRAR) was determined in 110 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed distal sensory polyneuropathy (SN) and normal sural responses. Forty-five consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed lumbosacral radiculopathy served as disease controls. Of the 110 SN patients, 32 were classified clinically as SN with large-fiber involvement (SN-LFI), whereas 78 had clinically pure small-fiber SN. Plantar NAP amplitudes were abnormal in 18 of 32 patients (56%) with SN-LFI, and 15 of 78 (19%) with small-fiber SN. A SRAR <0.21 (fifth percentile of normal) was found in 7 of 32 patients (22%) with SN-LFI and 8 of 78 (10%) with small-fiber SN. In the control group, the medial plantar NAP was normal in all 45 subjects (100%), whereas the SRAR was >0.21 in 43 subjects (96%). Thus, for a 50% pretest probability of SN-LFI, the positive predictive value of an abnormal medial plantar was 100% versus 85% for a SRAR <0.21. The medial plantar NAP amplitude is a more useful measure of SN, than is the SRAR, in patients under age 70, with suspected SN-LFI. The yield of the SRAR and plantar NAP amplitude is poor when clinical signs of large-fiber sensory dysfunction are lacking.
机译:在110名经临床诊断为远端感觉性多发性神经病(SN)和正常腓肠神经反应的连续患者中,测定了足底内侧神经动作电位(NAP)振幅与腓肠//动脉振幅比(SRAR)的电诊断率。连续四十五例临床诊断为腰s神经根病的患者作为疾病的控制者。在110例SN患者中,有32例在临床上被归类为大纤维受累(SN-LFI)的SN,而78例在临床上属于纯净小纤维SN。 SN-LFI的32例患者中有18例(56%)的足底NAP幅度异常,而小纤维SN的78例中有15例(19%)的足底NAP幅度异常。在32名SN-LFI患者中有7名(22%)和78名小纤维SN患者中有8名(10%)发现SRAR <0.21(正常值的百分之五)。在对照组中,所有45名受试者(100%)的内侧足底NAP均正常,而43名受试者(96%)的SRAR> 0.21。因此,对于SN-LFI的50%的预测试概率,内侧media异常的阳性预测值为100%,而SRAR <0.21的阳性预测值为85%。在70岁以下疑似SN-LFI的患者中,足底NAP幅度比SRAR更为有效。当缺乏大纤维感觉障碍的临床体征时,SRAR和足底NAP幅度的收率很差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号