【24h】

Smoking is not better for you than sleep apnea.

机译:吸烟对您来说并不比睡眠呼吸暂停更好。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Drs. Yegneswaran and Shapiro have recently suggested here that CPAP non-compliance in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients has a much greater effect on mortality than smoking does. But they have incorrectly used summary data from our Busselton Sleep Apnea cohort to support this claim. The figure is mislabelled, contains data that should not be plotted together, and there is no statistical testing of the hypothesis. The line marked Severe OSA is actually Moderate-Severe OSA, which means the line labelled mild and moderate OSA is probably the line for mild OSA from our data. The graph compares the OSA data collected on men and women of a rural town in Western Australia in 1990 with heavy smoking Finnish businessmen collected in 1974. Apart from obvious socioeconomic, geographical, and gender issues, the follow-up periods do not overlap (1990-2004) and (1974- ca. 1988). There are no reference categories for "No OSA" or "Never smoked" provided in their figure. Furthermore these are not independent categories because the Finns could have had OSA and some of the Australians smoked. The vertical axis has been re-drawn to maximise the apparent differences rather than giving a clear characterization of the absolute risk of death.
机译:博士Yegneswaran和Shapiro最近在这里提出,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的CPAP违规对死亡率的影响远大于吸烟。但是他们错误地使用了我们的Busselton Sleep呼吸暂停队列的摘要数据来支持这一说法。该图标签错误,包含不应一起绘制的数据,也没有对该假设进行统计检验。标记为严重OSA的行实际上是中度-严重OSA,这意味着根据我们的数据,标记为轻度和中度OSA的行可能是轻度OSA的行。该图将1990年在西澳大利亚州一个农村城镇的男女OSA数据与1974年在芬兰吸烟的富商进行了比较。除明显的社会经济,地理和性别问题外,随访时间也没有重叠(1990 -2004)和(1974-大约1988)。其图中没有提供“禁止OSA”或“禁止吸烟”的参考类别。此外,这些也不是独立的类别,因为芬兰人可能曾患OSA,并且一些澳大利亚人吸烟。重绘了垂直轴以最大程度地增加表观差异,而不是清楚地描述绝对的死亡风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号