首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical sleep medicine: JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine >A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin enacarbil in subjects with restless legs syndrome.
【24h】

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin enacarbil in subjects with restless legs syndrome.

机译:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的研究,用于评估加巴喷丁enacarbil在腿部躁动综合征患者中的疗效和耐受性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) 1200 mg or 600 mg compared with placebo in subjects with moderate-to-severe primary restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized subjects (1:1:1) to GEn 1200 mg, 600 mg, or placebo. Co-primary endpoints: mean change from baseline in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) total score and proportion of responders (rated as "very much" or "much" improved) on the investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) at Week 12 LOCF for GEn 1200 mg compared with placebo. Secondary endpoints included GEn 600 mg compared with placebo on the IRLS and CGI-I at Week 12 LOCF and subjective measures for sleep. Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events. RESULTS: 325 subjects were randomized (GEn 1200 mg = 113; 600 mg = 115; placebo = 97). GEn 1200 mg significantly improved mean [SD] IRLS total score at Week 12 LOCF (baseline: 23.2 [5.32]; Week 12: 10.2 [8.03]) compared with placebo (baseline: 23.8 [4.58]; Week 12: 14.0 [7.87]; adjusted mean treatment difference [AMTD]: -3.5; p = 0.0015), and significantly more GEn 1200 mg-treated (77.5%) than placebo-treated (44.8%) subjects were CGI-I responders (p < 0.0001). Similar significant results were observed with GEn 600 mg for IRLS (AMTD: -4.3; p < 0.0001) and CGI-I (72.8% compared with 44.8%; p < 0.0001). GEn also significantly improved sleep outcomes (Post-Sleep Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Sleep Diary and Medical Outcomes Sleep Scale) compared with placebo. The most commonly reported adverse events were somnolence (GEn 1200 mg = 18.0%; 600 mg = 21.7%; placebo = 2.1%) and dizziness (GEn 1200 mg = 24.3%; 600 mg = 10.4%; placebo = 5.2%). Dizziness increased with increased dose and led to discontinuation in 2 subjects (GEn 1200 mg, n = 1; GEn 600 mg, n = 1). Somnolence led to discontinuation in 3 subjects (GEn 600 mg). CONCLUSIONS: GEn 1200 mg and 600 mg significantly improve RLS symptoms and sleep disturbance compared with placebo and are generally well tolerated.
机译:目的:评价中度至重度原发性不安腿综合征(RLS)患者中加巴喷丁enacarbil(GEn)1200 mg或600 mg与安慰剂相比的疗效和耐受性。方法:这项为期12周,多中心,双盲,安慰剂对照的研究将受试者(1:1:1)随机分配到1200 mg,600 mg或安慰剂的GEn中。共同主要终点:在研究者评估的临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-)上,国际躁动腿量表(IRLS)总分和响应者比例(被评价为“非常”或“大大改善”)的平均变化I)与安慰剂相比,在第12周的LOCF中,GEn 1200 mg。次要终点包括LOn第12周时IRn和CGI-1与安慰剂相比的GEn 600 mg,以及睡眠的主观测量。安全性和耐受性评估包括不良事件。结果:325名受试者被随机分组​​(GEn 1200 mg = 113; 600 mg = 115;安慰剂= 97)。与安慰剂(基线:23.8 [4.58];第12周:14.0 [7.87])相比,GEn 1200 mg在LOCF第12周(基线:23.2 [5.32];第12周:10.2 [8.03])显着改善了[SD] IRLS平均评分;调整后的平均治疗差异[AMTD]:-3.5; p = 0.0015),CnI应答者显着高于接受安慰剂治疗(44.8%)的1200 mg GEn治疗组(77.5%)(p <0.0001)。用GEn 600 mg的IRLS(AMTD:-4.3; p <0.0001)和CGI-1(72.8%比44.8%; p <0.0001)观察到相似的显着结果。与安慰剂相比,GEn还显着改善了睡眠结局(睡眠后问卷,匹兹堡睡眠日记和医学成果睡眠量表)。最常见的不良事件是嗜睡(GEn 1200 mg = 18.0%; 600 mg = 21.7%;安慰剂= 2.1%)和头晕(GEn 1200 mg = 24.3%; 600 mg = 10.4%;安慰剂= 5.2%)。头晕随剂量增加而增加,导致2名受试者停药(GEn 1200 mg,n = 1; GEn 600 mg,n = 1)。嗜睡导致3名受试者(GEn 600 mg)停药。结论:与安慰剂相比,GEn 1200 mg和600 mg显着改善RLS症状和睡眠障碍,并且通常具有良好的耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号