...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of comparative effectiveness research >Evaluation of techniques for handling missing cost-to-charge ratios in the USA Nationwide Inpatient Sample: a simulation study
【24h】

Evaluation of techniques for handling missing cost-to-charge ratios in the USA Nationwide Inpatient Sample: a simulation study

机译:美国全国住院患者样本中处理缺失成本收费比的技术评估:一项模拟研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: Evaluate performance of techniques used to handle missing cost-to-charge ratio (CCR) data in the USA Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Methods: Four techniques to replace missing CCR data were evaluated: deleting discharges with missing CCRs (complete case analysis), reweighting as recommended by Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, reweighting by adjustment cells and hot deck imputation by adjustment cells. Bias and root mean squared error of these techniques on hospital cost were evaluated in five disease cohorts. Results & conclusion: Similar mean cost estimates would be obtained with any of the four techniques when the percentage of missing data is low (<10%). When total cost is the outcome of interest, a reweighting technique to avoid underestimation from dropping observations with missing data should be adopted.
机译:目的:评估美国医疗保健成本和利用项目的全国住院患者样本中用于处理缺失的成本收费比(CCR)数据的技术的性能。方法:评估了替换缺失的CCR数据的四种技术:删除具有缺失的CCR的排放(完整案例分析),按照医疗保健成本和利用项目的建议重新加权,通过调整单元重新加权以及通过调整单元进行热甲板插补。在五个疾病队列中评估了这些技术对医院费用的偏差和均方根误差。结果与结论:当丢失数据的百分比较低(<10%)时,使用四种技术中的任何一种都可以获得相似的平均成本估算。当总成本是所关注的结果时,应采用一种重新加权技术,以避免因丢失缺少数据的观测值而导致低估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号