首页> 外文期刊>Journal of communication disorders >Personality attributes of Iranian people who stutter
【24h】

Personality attributes of Iranian people who stutter

机译:口吃的伊朗人的人格特质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two recent studies from Australia and Germany have both shown that people who stutter (PWS) have elevated Neuroticism scores on the widely used NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) compared to individuals in a control sample. The two studies showed opposite results, however, for the personality traits Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. One reason for these opposing findings could be that the two studies were conducted in different cultural settings. Given that the effect of different cultural background on the relationship between the NEO-FFI and stuttering remains an open question, we investigated the NEO-FFI scores from 98 PWS and an age- and sex-matched control-group from a less widely studied cultural background (Iran). Overall, the present study showed, in line with a study from Germany, higher Agreeableness, but not Neuroticism, in PWS compared to normally fluent controls. To get further insights into these findings, we also contrasted both samples from Iran with a healthy matched sample from Germany. The resulting cross-cultural differences from these analyses are also discussed in the present paper. Although the present study is limited by a cross-sectional design, and so no causal conclusions can be drawn, the authors discuss whether the replicated elevated Agreeableness scores in PWS might represent a self-defense mechanism to cope with one's own speech handicap. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:来自澳大利亚和德国的两项最新研究均表明,与对照组样本中的个体相比,口吃的人(PWS)在广泛使用的NEO五因素清单(NEO-FFI)上的神经质得分更高。两项研究对于人格特质“令人愉快”和“尽责”显示出相反的结果。这些相反发现的原因可能是这两项研究是在不同的文化背景下进行的。鉴于不同文化背景对NEO-FFI和口吃之间关系的影响仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,我们调查了98个PWS以及年龄和性别匹配的对照组中NEO-FFI得分,而该研究组的研究对象则较少背景(伊朗)。总体而言,与来自德国的一项研究一致,本研究显示,与正常流利的对照组相比,PWS的较高的可及性,但不包括神经质。为了进一步了解这些发现,我们还将伊朗的两个样本与德国的健康匹配样本进行了对比。从这些分析中得出的跨文化差异也将在本文中进行讨论。尽管本研究受到横断面设计的限制,因此无法得出因果关系的结论,但作者讨论了PWS中复制的较高的Agreeableness分数是否可能代表自卫机制来应对自己的言语障碍。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号