首页> 外文期刊>Journal of commercial biotechnology >USPTO guidance on patentable subject matter: Impediment to biotechnology innovation?
【24h】

USPTO guidance on patentable subject matter: Impediment to biotechnology innovation?

机译:美国专利商标局关于可专利主题的指南:生物技术创新的障碍?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In June 2013,the U.S.Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision upending more than three decades worth of established patent practice when it ruled that isolated gene sequences are no longer patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C.Section 101.While many practitioners in the field believed that the USPTO would interpret the decision narrowly,the USPTO actually expanded the scope of the decision when it issued its guidelines for determining whether an invention satisfies Section 101.The guidelines were met with intense backlash with many arguing that they unnecessarily expanded the scope of the Supreme Court case in a way that could unduly restrict the scope of patentable subject matter,weaken the U.S.patent system,and create a disincentive to innovation.By undermining patentable subject matter in this way,the guidelines may end up harming not only the companies that patent medical innovations,but also the patients who need medical care.This article examines the guidelines and their impact on various technologies.
机译:2013年6月,美国最高法院发布了一项一致的裁决,裁定根据35 USCS第101条,分离的基因序列不再是可授予专利的客体,这颠覆了超过三十年的既有专利实践价值。尽管该领域的许多实践者认为,美国专利商标局会狭the地解释该决定,当美国专利商标局发布其确定发明是否符合第101条的准则时,实际上扩大了该决定的范围。该准则遭到强烈反对,许多人认为它们不必要地扩大了最高法院的范围。这种情况可能会不适当地限制可专利主题的范围,削弱美国专利制度,并不利于创新。通过以这种方式破坏可专利主题,准则可能最终不仅会损害获得专利的医疗公司创新,还有需要医疗的患者。本文研究了指南及其含义ct各种技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号