...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical infectious diseases >A Multicenter, double-blind trial of a high-dose caspofungin treatment regimen versus a standard caspofungin treatment regimen for adult patients with invasive candidiasis.
【24h】

A Multicenter, double-blind trial of a high-dose caspofungin treatment regimen versus a standard caspofungin treatment regimen for adult patients with invasive candidiasis.

机译:针对侵入性念珠菌病成年患者的大剂量卡泊芬净治疗方案与标准卡泊芬净治疗方案的多中心,双盲试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The standard caspofungin treatment regimen (50 mg/day after a 70-mg dose on day 1) is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, but experience with higher doses of caspofungin is limited. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of caspofungin at 3 times the standard dosing regimen. METHODS: Patients with proven invasive candidiasis were randomized to receive a standard or high-dose (150 mg/day) caspofungin treatment regimen. Safety was assessed in all patients as treated. Efficacy was assessed as a secondary objective in a full-analysis-set population. A favorable overall response was defined as symptom resolution and microbiological clearance at the end of caspofungin therapy. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included in the safety analysis (104 received the standard regimen, and 100 received the high-dose regimen), and 197 were included in the efficacy analysis (102 and 95 in the standard and high-dose treatment groups, respectively). Patient demographic characteristics, neutropenia status (6.7% and 8.0% had neutropenia, respectively), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (mean, 16.5 and 17, respectively) were similar between treatment groups. Significant drug-related adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients receiving the standard regimen and 3.0% of patients receiving the high-dose regimen (difference, 1.1%; 95% confidence interval, -4.1% to 6.8%). The most-common drug-related adverse events in the standard and high-dose treatment groups were phlebitis (3.8% and 2.0%, respectively), increased alkaline phosphatase level (6.9% and 2.0%, respectively), and increased aspartate transaminase level (4.0% and 2.0%, respectively). Overall, 71.6% of patients who received the standard regimen and 77.9% of patients who received the high-dose regimen had favorable overall responses (difference, 6.3%; 95% confidence interval, -5.9% to 18.4%; not statistically significant). Mortality at 8 weeks after therapy was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both caspofungin dosing regimens were effective and well tolerated in patients with invasive candidiasis. No safety concerns were found for caspofungin at a dosage of 150 mg/day.
机译:背景:标准卡泊芬净治疗方案(在第1天服用70毫克剂量后为50毫克/天)对于浸润性念珠菌病的治疗有效且耐受性良好,但使用卡泊芬净剂量较高的经验有限。我们以标准给药方案的3倍评估了卡泊芬净的安全性和有效性。方法:将确诊为侵袭性念珠菌病的患者随机接受标准或大剂量(150毫克/天)卡泊芬净治疗方案。评估所有接受治疗的患者的安全性。有效性被评估为全分析人群的次要目标。良好的总体反应定义为卡泊芬净治疗结束时的症状缓解和微生物清除率。结果:安全性分析共纳入204例患者(104例接受标准方案,大剂量方案100例),疗效分析中包括197例(标准和大剂量治疗方案分别为102例和95例)组)。治疗组之间的患者人口统计学特征,中性粒细胞减少状态(分别为6.7%和8.0%为中性粒细胞减少)以及急性生理和慢性健康评估II评分(分别为平均16.5和17)相似。接受标准方案的患者中有1.9%发生了与药物相关的严重不良事件,接受大剂量方案的患者中有3.0%发生了药物相关不良事件(差异为1.1%; 95%的置信区间为-4.1%至6.8%)。标准和高剂量治疗组中最常见的药物相关不良事件为静脉炎(分别为3.8%和2.0%),碱性磷酸酶水平升高(分别为6.9%和2.0%)和天冬氨酸转氨酶水平升高(分别为4.0%和2.0%)。总体而言,接受标准方案的患者有71.6%,接受大剂量方案的患者有77.9%的患者总体反应良好(差异为6.3%;置信区间为95%,-5.9%至18.4%;无统计学意义)。两组之间在治疗后8周的死亡率相似。结论:两种卡泊芬净给药方案对浸润性念珠菌病患者均有效且耐受性良好。没有发现卡泊芬净剂量为150 mg /天的安全性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号