首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology >Medicare part D's impact on antipsychotic drug use and costs among elderly patients without prior drug insurance.
【24h】

Medicare part D's impact on antipsychotic drug use and costs among elderly patients without prior drug insurance.

机译:在没有事先药物保险的老年患者中,Medicare D部分对抗精神病药物使用和费用的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Medicare part D's implementation improved access to and affordability of prescription drugs for the elderly without prior drug insurance. Effects for specific drugs and drug classes are less well understood. We assessed part D's impact on antipsychotic medication (APM) utilization and out-of-pocket costs among elderly without prior drug insurance. Retail pharmacy claims from 3 nationwide pharmacy chains were used to analyze 2 time-series designs: (1) a policy model, to obtain a policymaker's perspective: what was the overall impact of part D on APM use and costs among elderly without drug insurance in 2005 with the opportunity to enroll? And (2) a clinical model, to obtain a clinician's perspective: what would happen to elderly without drug insurance in 2005 who did enroll in part D--would they be able to get APMs? At what cost? Subgroup analyses among part D enrollees evaluated potentially different effects for patients who received a subsidy and patients who used antidementia drugs. In the policy model, part D implementation was associated with a 5% increase in APM use and a 37% reduction in out-of-pocket costs, suggesting a modest need for APMs among all previously uninsured elderly. Patients who did enroll in part D (clinical model) had a 97% increase in APM use and a 62% decrease in out-of-pocket costs, suggesting that patients who needed APMs were able to access them at low cost through the part D program. Part D implementation was associated with increased use and affordability of APMs for the elderly without prior drug insurance.
机译:在没有事先药物保险的情况下,Medicare D部分的实施改善了老年人处方药的获取和负担能力。对特定药物和药物类别的影响了解得很少。我们评估了D部分对没有预先药物保险的老年人对抗精神病药物(APM)利用率和自付费用的影响。来自3个全国性药房连锁店的零售药房索赔被用于分析2种时间序列设计:(1)政策模型,以获取政策制定者的观点:D部分对没有药品保险的老年人的APM使用和成本有何总体影响? 2005年有机会报名吗? (2)一种临床模型,以了解临床医生的观点:2005年没有参加D部分保险而没有药物保险的老年人会发生什么?他们将能够获得APM吗?要花多少钱? D部分入组者的亚组分析评估了接受补贴的患者和使用抗痴呆药的患者可能产生的不同影响。在政策模型中,D部分的实施与APM使用量增加5%和自付费用减少37%有关,这表明所有以前没有保险的老年人对APM的需求均不大。参加D部分(临床模型)的患者的APM使用量增加了97%,自付费用减少了62%,这表明需要APM的患者可以通过D部分以较低的价格获得费用。程序。 D部分的实施与无事先药物保险的老年人使用APM的增加和负担能力有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号