首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology >Effectiveness and cost of atypical versus typical antipsychotic treatment in a nationwide cohort of patients with schizophrenia in Germany
【24h】

Effectiveness and cost of atypical versus typical antipsychotic treatment in a nationwide cohort of patients with schizophrenia in Germany

机译:德国全国范围内精神分裂症患者非典型抗精神病药物治疗与典型抗精神病药物治疗的有效性和成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study investigates the effectiveness and cost of typical versus atypical antipsychotics in a nationwide German cohort of patients with schizophrenia. The study sample consisted of patients insured with 4 sickness funds (n = 8,610) who were followed up for 12 months after hospital discharge with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in 2003. Multivariate regression models were fitted to assess the relationship between outcome variables (rehospitalization, bed-days, prescriptions against adverse effects, cost) and medication type, sex, age, and severity. Severity was assessed by prior bed-days due to schizophrenia during 2000 to 2002. Risk of rehospitalization did not differ between groups but within each group severity (P = 0.0003). Males (P = 0.0016) and patients younger than 35 years (P < 0.0001) had a higher risk of rehospitalization. Number of bed-days was lower for treatment with typicals compared with atypicals (P < 0.0001); furthermore, bed-days depended on severity of disease (P < 0.0001). Prescriptions of drugs against extrapyramidal symptoms, anxiety, and agitation were higher for patients treated with typicals (P < 0.0001 for each). Mean predicted treatment cost per year was &OV0556;6442 for atypicals versus &OV0556;;4443 for typicals (P < 0.0001). This study does not support unconditional superiority of atypicals over typicals, neither in terms of effectiveness nor in terms of cost.
机译:这项研究调查了德国精神分裂症患者队列中典型抗精神病药与非典型抗精神病药的疗效和成本。该研究样本由拥有4个疾病基金(n = 8,610)的患者组成,他们在出院后进行了12个月的随访,并于2003年被诊断为精神分裂症。采用多元回归模型来评估结局变量(再次住院,床位-天,针对不良反应的处方,费用)以及药物类型,性别,年龄和严重程度。在2000年至2002年期间,根据精神分裂症的病床前来评估严重程度。两组之间再次住院的风险无差异,但在每组严重程度内(P = 0.0003)。男性(P = 0.0016)和35岁以下的患者(P <0.0001)的再次住院风险更高。与非典型药物相比,典型药物治疗的卧床日数较少(P <0.0001);此外,就寝日数取决于疾病的严重程度(P <0.0001)。对于接受典型治疗的患者,针对锥体外系症状,焦虑和躁动的药物处方较高(每个患者P <0.0001)。非典型患者的每年平均预计治疗费用为&OV0556; 6442,而典型患者为&OV0556 ;; 4443(P <0.0001)。这项研究不支持非典型性药物在有效性和成本方面均无条件优于典型药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号