首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychopharmacology >A randomized, 1-year follow-up study of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of negative symptoms in outpatients with schizophrenia.
【24h】

A randomized, 1-year follow-up study of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of negative symptoms in outpatients with schizophrenia.

机译:奥氮平和利培酮治疗精神分裂症门诊患者阴性症状的随机,1年随访研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine compared with risperidone in negative symptoms, after 1 year of treatment, in schizophrenic outpatients with prominent negative symptoms. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, monitored, open-label, parallel, dose-flexible, 1-year study of outpatients with schizophrenia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria) with prominent negative symptoms (Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms [SANS] summary score > or =10) previously treated with conventional antipsychotics. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with an initial dose of olanzapine 10 mg/d or more (n = 120) or risperidone 3 mg/d or more (n = 115). The primary efficacy measure was the SANS summary score. Secondary efficacy measures included Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale, Calgary Depression Scale, and Social Functioning Scale. The response rate was defined as 30% or more of improvement in the SANS summary score. RESULTS: The mean dose throughout the study was 12.2 mg/d (+/-5.8 mg/d) for olanzapine and 4.9 mg/d (+/-2.0 mg/d) for risperidone. At 1 year, olanzapine patients showed significantly higher improvement than risperidone patients on the SANS summary (P = 0.015) and on the affective flattening (P = 0.007) and avolition/apathy (P = 0.028) SANS subscales. There were also significant improvements in favor of olanzapine in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms summary (P = 0.021), Clinical Global Impression of Severity (P = 0.008), and Social Functioning Scale total (P < 0.001) scores. The response rate was greater (P = 0.001) in the olanzapine cohort (69.2%) than in the risperidone cohort (48.7%). Olanzapine patients reported less extrapyramidal side effects but a higher incidence of clinically important body weight increase than risperidone patients. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with olanzapine was associated with significantly better improvement in negative symptoms as compared with risperidone-treated schizophrenic outpatients with prominent negative symptoms.
机译:目的:评价奥氮平与利培酮相比在治疗1年后对具有明显阴性症状的精神分裂症门诊患者的阴性症状的疗效。方法:这是一项对精神分裂症门诊患者的多中心,随机,监测,开放标签,平行,剂量灵活,为期一年的研究(精神疾病诊断和统计手册,第四版标准),具有明显的阴性症状(先前用常规抗精神病药治疗的阴性症状评估[SANS]总评分>或= 10)。患者被随机分配接受初始剂量奥氮平10 mg / d或更高(n = 120)或利培酮3 mg / d或更高(n = 115)的治疗。主要功效指标是SANS汇总评分。次要疗效指标包括阳性症状评估量表,严重程度临床整体印象量表,卡尔加里抑郁量表和社交功能量表。响应率定义为SANS汇总分数提高30%或以上。结果:在整个研究中,奥氮平的平均剂量为12.2 mg / d(+/- 5.8 mg / d),利培酮的平均剂量为4.9 mg / d(+/- 2.0 mg / d)。在1年时,奥氮平患者在SANS汇总(P = 0.015),情感扁平化(P = 0.007)和意志/信念(P = 0.028)SANS量表上显示出比利培酮患者明显更高的改善。在积极症状评估量表(P = 0.021),临床总体严重程度印象(P = 0.008)和社会功能量表总分(P <0.001)评分中,对奥氮平也有明显改善。奥氮平组(69.2%)的应答率高于利培酮组(48.7%)(P = 0.001)。与奥氮平患者相比,奥氮平患者报告的锥体束外副作用少,但临床上重要的体重增加发生率更高。结论:奥氮平长期治疗与阴性症状明显改善的利培酮治疗精神分裂症门诊患者相比,阴性症状明显改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号