首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings >Validation of a Brief Structured Interview: The Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS)
【24h】

Validation of a Brief Structured Interview: The Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS)

机译:简短的结构化面试的验证:儿童精神病综合症的面试(ChIPS)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence-based assessment is important in the treatment of childhood psychopathology. While researchers and clinicians frequently use structured diagnostic interviews to ensure reliability, the most commonly used instrument, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children (K-SADS) is too long for most clinical applications. The Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS/P-ChIPS) is a highly-structured brief diagnostic interview. The present study compared K-SADS and ChIPS/P-ChIPS diagnoses in an outpatient clinical sample of 50 parent-child pairs aged 7-14. Agreement between most diagnoses was moderate to high between the instruments and with consensus clinical diagnoses. ChIPS was significantly briefer to administer than the K-SADS. Interviewer experience level and participant demographics did not appear to affect agreement. Results provide further evidence for the validity of the ChIPS and support its use in clinical and research settings.
机译:循证评估在治疗儿童心理病理学方面很重要。虽然研究人员和临床医生经常使用结构化诊断访谈来确保可靠性,但最常用的工具,《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症时间表》(K-SADS)对于大多数临床应用而言太长了。儿童精神病综合症访谈(ChIPS / P-ChIPS)是高度结构化的简短诊断性访谈。本研究在50个7-14岁的亲子对的门诊临床样本中比较了K-SADS和ChIPS / P-ChIPS诊断。仪器之间和临床诊断一致时,大多数诊断之间的一致性为中度到高度。 ChIPS的管理要比K-SADS简短得多。采访者的经验水平和参加者的人口统计学似乎并未影响协议。结果为ChIPS的有效性提供了进一步的证据,并支持其在临床和研究环境中的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号