首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychology >Concerns about substandard training for prescription privileges for psychologists.
【24h】

Concerns about substandard training for prescription privileges for psychologists.

机译:对心理学家处方特权培训不合标准的担忧。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This Commentary on the Muse and McGrath study (this issue, pp. 96-103) refutes its conclusion that the amount of training for prescription privileges for psychologists (RxP) is equal to or greater than that for psychiatric nurse practitioners and physicians. First, the sample failed to include only training programs for nurses and psychologists that lead to independent prescribing. Second, training was defined by an arbitrary, nonvalidated list of "key content areas" that excluded much of the standard medical curricula for nurses and physicians to prescribe. Third, the levels of training for which the "key content areas" were assessed omitted undergraduate prerequisites, apprenticeships, supervised practice, and residencies that are a standard part of the nursing and physician programs studied. RxP training remains substandard.
机译:关于缪斯和麦格拉思研究的评论(此问题,第96-103页)驳斥了其结论,即心理学家处方特权培训(RxP)的数量等于或大于精神科护士和医生的数量。首先,样本未能仅包括针对护士和心理学家的培训计划,这些计划导致独立开处方。其次,培训是通过任意的,未经验证的“关键内容领域”列表来定义的,该列表不包括护士和医生所规定的许多标准医学课程。第三,评估“关键内容领域”的培训水平省略了大学预科课程,学徒制,有监督的实践和住院医师的要求,这些都是研究的护理和医师课程的标准组成部分。 RxP培训仍然不合格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号