首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Climate >Evaluation of the NASA GISS Single-Column Model simulated clouds using combined surface and satellite observations.
【24h】

Evaluation of the NASA GISS Single-Column Model simulated clouds using combined surface and satellite observations.

机译:使用组合的地面和卫星观测评估NASA GISS单列模型模拟的云。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Three years of surface and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) data from the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) site are used to evaluate the NASA GISS Single Column Model (SCM) simulated clouds from January 1999 to December 2001. The GOES-derived total cloud fractions for both 0.5 degrees and 2.5 degrees grid boxes are in excellent agreement with surface observations, suggesting that ARM point observations can represent large areal observations. Low (<2 km), middle (2-6 km), and high (>6 km) levels of cloud fractions, however, have negative biases as compared to the ARM results due to multilayer cloud scenes that can either mask lower cloud layers or cause misidentifications of cloud tops. Compared to the ARM observations, the SCM simulated most midlevel clouds, overestimated low clouds (4%), and underestimated total and high clouds by 7% and 15%, respectively. To examine the dependence of the modeled high and low clouds on the large-scale synoptic patterns, variables such as relative humidity (RH) and vertical pressure velocity (omega) from North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) data are included. The successfully modeled and missed high clouds are primarily associated with a trough and ridge upstream of the ARM SGP, respectively. The PDFs of observed high and low occurrence as a function of RH reveal that high clouds have a Gaussian-like distribution with mode RH values of 40%-50%, whereas low clouds have a gammalike distribution with the highest cloud probability occurring at RH 75%-85%. The PDFs of modeled low clouds are similar to those observed; however, for high clouds the PDFs are shifted toward higher values of RH. This results in a negative bias for the modeled high clouds because many of the observed clouds occur at RH values below the SCM-specified stratiform parameterization threshold RH of 60%. Despite many similarities between PDFs derived from the NARR and ARM forcing datasets for RH and omega, differences do exist. This warrants further investigation of the forcing and reanalysis datasets.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3353.1
机译:能源大气辐射测量部(ARM)南部大平原(SGP)站点的三年地面和对地静止业务环境卫星(GOES)数据用于评估1999年1月至2004年的NASA GISS单列模型(SCM)模拟云。 2001年12月。GOES得出的0.5度和2.5度网格框的总云分数与表面观测值非常吻合,这表明ARM点观测值可以代表较大的区域观测值。与ARM结果相比,低(<2 km),中(2-6 km)和高(> 6 km)的云部分具有负偏差,这是因为多层云场景可以掩盖较低的云层或导致对云层的错误识别。与ARM观察相比,SCM分别模拟了大多数中层云,高估了低云(4%)以及低估了总云和高云7%和15%。为了检查建模的高云和低云对大规模天气模式的依赖性,包括了来自北美区域再分析(NARR)数据的变量,例如相对湿度(RH)和垂直压力速度(Ω)。成功建模和错过的高云主要分别与ARM SGP上游的低谷和山脊有关。观测到的高和低发生率的PDF随RH的变化显示,高云具有高斯样分布,其模式RH值为40%-50%,而低云具有伽马样分布,在RH 75时出现的可能性最高%-85%。建模的低云的PDF与所观察到的相似。但是,对于高云,PDF会朝着更高的RH值移动。由于许多观测到的云出现在RH值低于SCM指定的层状参数化阈值RH 60%的情况下,因此对建模的高云产生了负偏差。尽管从NARR和ARM强迫数据集的RH和omega导出的PDF之间有许多相似之处,但确实存在差异。这需要进一步研究强迫和再分析数据集。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3353.1

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号