...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Climate >A Comparison of Antarctic Ice Sheet Surface Mass Balance from Atmospheric Climate Models and In Situ Observations
【24h】

A Comparison of Antarctic Ice Sheet Surface Mass Balance from Atmospheric Climate Models and In Situ Observations

机译:大气气候模式和原位观测资料对南极冰盖表面质量平衡的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study, 3265 multiyear averaged in situ observations and 29 observational records at annual time scale are used to examine the performance of recent reanalysis and regional atmospheric climate model products [ ERA-Interim, JRA-55, MERRA, the Polar version of MM5 (PMM5), RACMO2.1, and RACMO2.3] for their spatial and interannual variability of Antarctic surface mass balance (SMB), respectively. Simulated precipitation seasonality is also evaluated using three in situ observations and model intercomparison. All products qualitatively capture the macroscale spatial variability of observed SMB, but it is not possible to rank their relative performance because of the sparse observations at coastal regions with an elevation range from 200 to 1000 m. In terms of the absolute amount of observed snow accumulation in interior Antarctica, RACMO2.3 fits best, while the other models either underestimate (JRA-55, MERRA, ERA-Interim, and RACMO2.1) or overestimate (PMM5) the accumulation. Despite underestimated precipitation by the three reanalyses and RACMO2.1, this feature is clearly improved in JRA-55. However, because of changes in the observing system, especially the dramatically increased satellite observations for data assimilation, JRA-55 presents a marked jump in snow accumulation around 1979 and a large increase after the late 1990s. Although precipitation seasonality over the whole ice sheet is common for all products, ERA-Interim provides an unrealistic estimate of precipitation seasonality on the East Antarctic plateau, with high precipitation strongly peaking in summer. ERA-Interim shows a significant correlation with interannual variability of observed snow accumulation measurements at 28 of 29 locations, whereas fewer than 20 site observations significantly correlate with simulations by the other models. This suggests that ERA-Interim exhibits the highest performance of interannual variability in the observed precipitation.
机译:在这项研究中,使用3265多年平均原位观测值和29个观测值(按年时间尺度)来检验近期再分析和区域大气气候模型产品的性能[ERA-Interim,JRA-55,MERRA,极地版MM5( (PMM5),RACMO2.1和RACMO2.3]分别表示南极表面质量平衡(SMB)的空间和年际变化。还使用三个原位观测和模型比对来评估模拟的降水季节。所有产品定性地捕获了所观察到的SMB的宏观空间变异性,但是由于在海拔200至1000 m的沿海地区观察稀疏,因此无法对它们的相对性能进行排名。就南极内部观测到的积雪的绝对数量而言,RACMO2.3最合适,而其他模型要么低估(JRA-55,MERRA,ERA-Interim和RACMO2.1),要么高估积雪。尽管通过三个再分析和RACMO2.1低估了降水量,但在JRA-55中此功能明显得到改善。但是,由于观测系统的变化,特别是卫星对数据同化的观测急剧增加,JRA-55在1979年前后积雪明显增加,在1990年代后期出现大幅度增加。尽管所有产品在整个冰盖上都有降水季节,但ERA-Interim估计的南极东部降水季节不切实际,夏季高降水高峰。 ERA-Interim显示与在29个位置中的28个位置观测到的积雪测量值的年际变化显着相关,而少于20个站点观测值与其他模型的模拟显着相关。这表明,ERA-Interim在观测到的降水中表现出最高的年际变化性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号