...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemical Education >Review of Clickers in Action: Active Learning in Organic Chemistry
【24h】

Review of Clickers in Action: Active Learning in Organic Chemistry

机译:行动中的答题者回顾:有机化学中的主动学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While a great deal has been written about active learning approaches in the general chemistry sequence, reports of the same in organic chemistry courses have been slower to appear. Similarly, many departments have been faster to adopt the technologies into their lower-division coursework, but more hesitant to explore upper-division courses in this fashion, in part because of concerns about how best to use clickers in a course that is generally considered to be largely nonquantitative. Much like Margaret R. Asirvatham's similarly titled work did for general chemistry,~1 Ruder's svelte book is designed to motivate and encourage the use of classroom response systems (clickers) for use in organic chemistry courses. Like Asirvatham, Ruder begins with a relatively short summary of the motivations and recent literature regarding the use of this now-familiar technology. However, much has happened since the 2009 predecessor was published. The use of clickers is largely considered as a tool for use in active-learning techniques, rather than as a separate technology, which is reflected in Ruder's title and in the first few chapters. Many readers will recognize some of her suggestions about how best to use (or not use!) clickers from the behaviors and attitudes of their colleagues, or will identify with student comments or complaints from their own or others' courses. While a book on clickers naturally focuses on the positive feedback from students about how clickers help them stay engaged in class, think critically, and learn more deeply, this one offers a few words of good advice on activities to avoid. As the costs of tuition, fees, and course materials rises faster than average household income, students are disenchanted with instructors who use the clickers primarily as a means of taking attendance, or who use them exclusively for graded quizzes or even exams. While most systems on the market today have had the hardware bugs minimized for years, batteries and just plain forgetfulness on the part of students are unlikely to make any personal classroom technology perfect. If you choose to use a response system in your classroom, this text will help convince you that you must make it worth the cost to the student by carefully structuring the questions and critically analyzing the responses you receive to maximize student learning.
机译:尽管在一般化学顺序中已经有很多关于主动学习方法的文章,但有机化学课程中有关主动学习方法的报道却出现得较慢。同样,许多部门在将技术应用到其较低级别的课程中的速度更快,但是更犹豫地以这种方式来探索较高级别的课程,部分原因是担心通常在以下情况下如何最好地使用答题器:在很大程度上是非量化的。就像玛格丽特·R·阿西尔瓦瑟姆(Margaret R.像Asirvatham一样,Ruder从相对简短的动机动机总结以及有关使用这种现在熟悉的技术的最新文献开始。但是,自2009年的前身发布以来,发生了很多事情。答题器的使用在很大程度上被认为是用于主动学习技术的工具,而不是一种单独的技术,这在Ruder的书名和前几章中得到了体现。许多读者会从同事的行为和态度中认识到她关于如何最好地使用(或不使用!)点击程序的一些建议,或者会从学生对自己或他人课程的评论或投诉中识别出一些建议。虽然一本关于答题器的书很自然地侧重于学生对答题器如何帮助他们保持学习,批判性思考和更深入学习的积极反馈,但是这本书为避免活动提供了一些好的建议。由于学费,杂费和教材费用的增长速度快于家庭平均收入,学生对主要使用答题器作为出勤方式,或仅将答题器用于分级测验甚至考试的老师感到迷惑。尽管当今市场上的大多数系统多年来已将硬件错误最小化,但是电池和学生的健忘性不太可能使任何个人教室技术变得完美。如果您选择在教室中使用答复系统,则本文将帮助您说服您,必须认真设计问题并严格分析收到的答复以最大程度地提高学生的学习水平,使这笔费用对学生来说值得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号