首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemometrics >Quo vadis, chemometrics?
【24h】

Quo vadis, chemometrics?

机译:化学计量学,你要去哪里?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Assessing current trends in chemometric publications reveals that most projects utilize known methodologies and fall into the category application. There seems to be worrying little of true innovation unless one counts fashions assimilated from other fields. The field may have reached a crossroad: One path leads to chemometrics becoming a fully mature but stagnant tool for analytical chemists; the other path, that is, maintaining chemometrics as an active and widely recognized research field, requires opening new research areas for chemometricians. It is argued that hard modeling as opposed to the ubiquitous soft modeling may become such a new direction. Hard modeling would focus on investigating chemical mechanisms that give raise to measured data as opposed to empirically analyzing data.Furthermore, chemometricians in academia are responsible for preparing the next generation of chemometricians. Despite the need for chemometricians in the workforce, the number of young chemometricians is low and will remain low unless changes in chemistry curricula happen. This remains a challenge because there are fundamental issues that need to be overcome. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:评估化学计量学出版物的当前趋势表明,大多数项目都利用已知的方法,并且属于类别应用程序。除非有人指望从其他领域吸收来的时尚,否则真正的创新似乎很少有人担心。这个领域可能已经到了一个十字路口:一条道路导致化学计量学成为分析化学家的一种完全成熟但停滞的工具。另一条途径,即保持化学计量学是一个活跃且得到广泛认可的研究领域,需要为化学计量师开辟新的研究领域。有人认为,与无处不在的软建模相反,硬建模可能会成为一个新的方向。硬建模将重点研究引起实测数据的化学机制,而不是凭经验分析数据。此外,学术界的化学计量师负责准备下一代的化学计量师。尽管劳动力中需要化学计量师,但年轻的化学计量师的人数很少,并且除非化学课程发生变化,否则将保持低水平。这仍然是一个挑战,因为需要解决一些基本问题。版权所有(c)2014 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号