首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemometrics >Sum of ranking differences for method discrimination and its validation: comparison of ranks with random numbers
【24h】

Sum of ranking differences for method discrimination and its validation: comparison of ranks with random numbers

机译:方法判别及其验证的排名差异总和:具有随机数的排名比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper describes the theoretical background, algorithm and validation of a recently developed novel method of ranking based on the sum of ranking differences [TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2010;;29: 101 -109]. The ranking is intended to compare models, methods, analytical techniques, panel members, etc. and it is entirely general. First, the objects to be ranked are arranged in the rows and the variables (for example model results) in the columns of an input matrix. Then, the results of each model for each object are ranked in the order of increasing magnitude. The difference between the rank of the model results and the rank of the known, reference or standard results is then computed. (If the golden standard ranking is known the rank differences can be completed easily.) In the end, the absolute values of the differences are summed together for all models to be compared. The sum of ranking differences (SRD) arranges the models in a unique and unambiguous way. The closer the SRD value to zero (i.e. the closer the ranking to the golden standard), the better is the model. The proximity of SRD values shows similarity of the models, whereas large variation will imply dissimilarity. Generally, the average can be accepted as the golden standard in the absence of known or reference results, even if bias is also present in the model results in addition to random error. Validation of the SRD method can be carried out by using simulated random numbers for comparison (permutation test). A recursive algorithm calculates the discrete distribution for a small number of objects (n < 14), whereas the normal distribution is used as a reasonable approximation if the number of objects is large. The theoretical distribution is visualized for random numbers and can be used to identify SRD values for models that are far from being random. The ranking and validation procedures are called Sum of Ranking differences (SRD) and Comparison of Ranks by Random Numbers (CRNN), respectively.
机译:本文介绍了一种基于排名差异之和的最新开发的新颖排名方法的理论背景,算法和验证。化学2010 ;; 29:101 -109]。该排名旨在比较模型,方法,分析技术,小组成员等,并且完全是一般性的。首先,要排序的对象排列在输入矩阵的行中,变量(例如模型结果)排列在输入矩阵的列中。然后,将每个对象的每个模型的结果按幅度递增的顺序进行排序。然后计算模型结果的等级与已知,参考或标准结果的等级之间的差。 (如果知道黄金标准排名,则可以轻松完成等级差异。)最后,将要比较的所有模型的差异绝对值相加。排名差异之和(SRD)以独特且明确的方式排列模型。 SRD值越接近零(即排名越接近黄金标准),则模型越好。 SRD值的接近表明模型相似,而较大的差异则暗示不相似。通常,即使模型结果除随机误差外也存在偏差,也可以在没有已知结果或参考结果的情况下将平均值作为黄金标准。 SRD方法的验证可以通过使用模拟随机数进行比较(置换测试)来进行。递归算法计算少量对象(n <14)的离散分布,而如果对象数量较大,则将正态分布用作合理的近似值。理论分布可视化为随机数,可用于识别远非随机的模型的SRD值。排名和验证过程分别称为排名差异总和(SRD)和随机数排名比较(CRNN)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号