首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Benchmarks for Electronically Excited States: A Comparison of Noniterative and Iterative Triples Corrections in Linear Response Coupled Cluster Methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3
【24h】

Benchmarks for Electronically Excited States: A Comparison of Noniterative and Iterative Triples Corrections in Linear Response Coupled Cluster Methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3

机译:电子激发态基准:线性响应耦合簇方法中非迭代和迭代三元校正的比较:CCSDR(3)与CC3

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CCSDR(3) calculations of vertical excitation energies are reported for a set of 24 molecules and 121 excited valence singlet states from a recently published benchmark of organic molecules. The same geometries (MP2/6-31G~*) and basis set (TZVP) were employed as in our previous linear response CC2, CCSD, and CC3 calculations. The CCSDR(3) results are compared against the CCSD and CC3 results. Statistical evaluation of all CCSDR(3) excitation energies gives mean absolute deviations of 0.09 eV from CC3 and 0.30 eV from CCSD. For excited states, which are dominated by single excitations, the absolute mean deviation from CC3 is reduced to 0.02 eV and the maximum deviation is 0.09 eV. CCSDR(3) is thus a very cost-effective accurate alternative to CC3.
机译:根据最近发布的有机分子基准,报告了一组24个分子和121个激发价单重态的垂直激发能的CCSDR(3)计算。与我们先前的线性响应CC2,CCSD和CC3计算一样,采用了相同的几何形状(MP2 / 6-31G〜*)和基集(TZVP)。将CCSDR(3)结果与CCSD和CC3结果进行比较。对所有CCSDR(3)激发能的统计评估得出,CC3的平均绝对偏差为0.09 eV,CCSD为0.30 eV。对于以单个激发为主的激发态,与CC3的绝对平均偏差减小至0.02 eV,最大偏差为0.09 eV。因此,CCSDR(3)是CC3的一种非常经济高效的准确替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号