...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >The effect of acute versus delayed remote ischemic preconditioning on reperfusion induced ventricular arrhythmias
【24h】

The effect of acute versus delayed remote ischemic preconditioning on reperfusion induced ventricular arrhythmias

机译:急性与延迟远距离缺血预处理对再灌注引起的室性心律失常的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: The effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on arrhythmias in in vivo models is unknown. Our purpose was to determine effects of both acute and delayed RIPC on arrhythmias. Methods and Results: In the acute protocol anesthetized open chest rats were exposed to 5 minutes of proximal left coronary artery occlusion (CAO) and 10 minutes of reperfusion. Rats were either untreated (ischemia/reperfusion, IR group, n = 17) or received RIPC (n = 14) with 5 minutes bilateral femoral occlusions followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion times 3, started 30 minutes before CAO. At reperfusion, onset of ventricular tachycardia (VT) was delayed in RIPC group (25.7 seconds) versus IR (8.8 seconds; P = 0.04). Number of episodes of VT was 17.0 in IR versus 3.0 in the RIPC group (P = 0.01) and duration of VT was 54.1 seconds in IR versus 4.9 seconds in RIPC (P = 0.019). Number of ventricular premature complexes (VPC) was 26.0 in IR and 10.0 in RIPC rats (P = 0.04). Levels of reperfusion injury salvage kinases (RISK), that is, phospho-Akt and phospho-p70S6 in the risk area of IR and RIPC hearts were similarly higher compared to the nonischemic areas both at 1 and 10 minutes into reperfusion. Delayed RIPC was induced on day 1 and on day 2, myocardial IR was induced. Delayed RIPC did not affect VT or VPC. Conclusion: Acute RIPC of the lower limbs induced a powerful delay in/and reduction in IR induced ventricular arrhythmias, but without evoking the RISK pathway; a late protective phase of RIPC on arrhythmias did not occur.
机译:简介:在体内模型中,远程缺血预处理(RIPC)对心律不齐的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是确定急性和延迟RIPC对心律不齐的影响。方法和结果:在急性方案中,麻醉的开胸大鼠暴露于左冠状动脉近端闭塞(CAO)5分钟,再灌注10分钟。大鼠未接受治疗(缺血/再灌注,IR组,n = 17)或接受RIPC(n = 14),双侧股骨闭塞5分钟,然后5分钟再灌注3次,开始于CAO前30分钟。在再灌注时,RIPC组的室性心动过速(VT)的发作被延迟(25.7秒),而IR组被延迟(8.8秒; P = 0.04)。 VT的发作次数在IR中为17.0,而RIPC组为3.0(P = 0.01),IR的VT持续时间为54.1秒,而RIPC为4.9秒(P = 0.019)。室性早搏复合物(VPC)在IR中为26.0,在RIPC大鼠中为10.0(P = 0.04)。在再灌注1分钟和10分钟时,IR和RIPC心脏危险区域的再灌注损伤挽救激酶(RISK),即磷酸Akt和磷酸化p70S6的水平同样高于非缺血区域。在第1天和第2天诱导RIPC延迟,诱导心肌IR。延迟的RIPC不会影响VT或VPC。结论:下肢急性RIPC引起IR引起的室性心律不齐的强烈延迟和/或减少,但未引起RISK通路。 RIPC对心律不齐的晚期保护期并未发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号