...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Characterization of atrial activation (A-A) intervals during atrial fibrillation due to a single driver: do they reflect atrial effective refractory periods?
【24h】

Characterization of atrial activation (A-A) intervals during atrial fibrillation due to a single driver: do they reflect atrial effective refractory periods?

机译:由单一驱动因素引起的心房颤动期间心房激活(A-A)间隔的特征:它们是否反映了心房有效不应期?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The mean, median, and minimum local atrial activation (A-A) intervals have been used to determine the local atrial effective refractory period (AERP) during atrial fibrillation (AF), the underlying assumption being that AF is due to multiple reentrant wavelets. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that when AF is due to a single, rapid, stable reentrant circuit (driver), the minimum and mean local A-A intervals will be similar at sites in the reentrant circuit, but will vary widely at sites with fibrillatory conduction, making these latter intervals unreliable indicators of AERP. METHODS: During sustained AF due to a left atrial (LA) driver in 6 sterile pericarditis dogs, electrograms were recorded from 186 bipolar electrodes from both atria. A-A intervals were measured from each recording site during 1.2 seconds of AF. Minimum A-A intervals as well as temporal (within site) and spatial (between sites) variability were determined from all sites. RESULTS: A-A intervals from each site during AF demonstrated that (1) 90-100% of right atrial (RA) sites and 18-39% of LA sites showed considerable (SD > 6 ms) temporal variability; (2) RA and LA sites with fibrillatory conduction (SD > 6 ms) showed considerable (a) spatial variability (RA: 9-36 ms; LA: 5-27 ms) and (b) variability of the minimum A-A intervals (RA: 14-35 ms; LA 11-28 ms). CONCLUSION: During AF due to a driver, areas with fibrillatory conduction manifested considerable variability in the mean and the minimum A-A intervals. Therefore, it is unlikely that any of the A-A intervals reflect AERP.
机译:背景:平均,中位和最小局部房颤激活(A-A)间隔已被用于确定房颤(AF)期间的局部房颤有效不应期(AERP),基本假设是AF是由于多个折返小波引起的。目的:我们测试了以下假设:当房颤归因于单个,快速,稳定的折返回路(驱动器)时,折返回路中的局部最小AA间隔和平均局部AA间隔将相似,但在纤颤传导部位会出现很大差异,从而使后面的间隔成为AERP的可靠指标。方法:在6只无菌心包炎犬中,由于左房(LA)驱动器导致持续房颤期间,记录了来自两个心房的186个双极电极的电描记图。在AF的1.2秒内从每个记录位置测量A-A间隔。从所有位点确定最小A-A间隔以及时间(位点内)和空间(位点之间)的变异性。结果:房颤期间每个部位的A-A间隔表明(1)90-100%的右心房(RA)部位和18-39%的LA部位表现出相当大的时间差异(SD> 6 ms); (2)具有纤颤传导的RA和LA部位(SD> 6 ms)显示出可观的(a)空间变异(RA:9-36 ms; LA:5-27 ms)和(b)最小AA间隔的变异(RA :14-35毫秒;洛杉矶11-28毫秒)。结论:由于驾驶员的房颤期间,具有纤颤性传导的区域在平均和最小A-A间隔内表现出相当大的变异性。因此,任何A-A间隔都不太可能反映AERP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号