...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Impact of amiodarone on electrophysiologic properties of pulmonary veins in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Impact of amiodarone on electrophysiologic properties of pulmonary veins in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

机译:胺碘酮对阵发性心房颤动患者肺静脉电生理特性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary veins (PVs) are the predominant location of triggers for atrial fibrillation (AF), but little is known about the electrophysiologic properties of PVs. In addition, the influence of amiodarone on the electrophysiologic properties of PVs has not been elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with symptomatic and drug-resistant AF were divided into two groups: group 1 patients (n=29) without antiarrhythmic drug therapy at the time of electrophysiologic study (EPS), and group 2 patients (n=26) undergoing continuous long-term treatment with amiodarone. EPS including programmed stimulation of both atria and within the PVs was performed in both groups. In group 1, the effective refractory period (ERP) of all PVs (174 +/- 62 msec) was significantly shorter than the ERP of the left atrium ([LA] 254 +/- 30 msec, P=0.0001) and right atrium ([RA] 221 +/- 29 msec, P=0.0001). The same pattern was observed in group 2 (PV: 210 +/- 58 msec; LA: 259 +/- 35 msec, P=0.0001; RA: 246 +/- 37 msec, P=0.0255). The ERP of all stimulated PVs was significantly lower in group 1 (174 +/- 62 msec) than in group 2 (210 +/- 58 msec; P=0.0001). The ERP of the left superior and right superior PVs and RA but not the left inferior PV and LA were significantly increased in patients treated with amiodarone. Decremental conduction properties were observed in all stimulated PVs, and there were no significantly differences between the maximal decrement of both groups. CONCLUSION: The distinctive electrophysiologic properties of PVs are emphasized by amiodarone therapy. Long-term amiodarone treatment is responsible for heterogeneous alteration of the PV electrophysiology, which may account for the individual antiarrhythmic responses in a subset of patients with paroxysmal AF.
机译:简介:肺静脉(PVs)是房颤(AF)触发的主要部位,但对PVs的电生理特性知之甚少。另外,尚未阐明胺碘酮对PVs电生理特性的影响。方法和结果:将55例有症状且耐药的房颤患者分为两组:在电生理研究(EPS)时未进行抗心律不齐药物治疗的第1组(n = 29)和第2组(n = 2) 26)接受胺碘酮持续长期治疗。两组均进行了包括对心房和PV内的程序性刺激的EPS。在第1组中,所有PV的有效不应期(ERP)(174 +/- 62毫秒)明显短于左心房([LA] 254 +/- 30毫秒,P = 0.0001)和右心房的ERP ([RA] 221 +/- 29毫秒,P = 0.0001)。在组2中观察到相同的模式(PV:210 +/- 58毫秒; LA:259 +/- 35毫秒,P = 0.0001; RA:246 +/- 37毫秒,P = 0.0255)。第1组(174 +/- 62毫秒)的所有受刺激PV的ERP显着低于第2组(210 +/- 58毫秒; P = 0.0001)。胺碘酮治疗的患者左上,右上PV和RA的ERP显着增加,而左下PV和LA则没有。在所有刺激的PV中观察到递减的传导性质,并且两组的最大递减之间没有显着差异。结论:胺碘酮治疗强调了PV的独特的电生理特性。长期胺碘酮治疗可引起PV电生理的异质性改变,这可能解释了阵发性AF患者中个别的抗心律失常反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号