...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Anterograde slow pathway is not the same as retrograde slow pathway conducted in the reverse direction in patients with uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.
【24h】

Anterograde slow pathway is not the same as retrograde slow pathway conducted in the reverse direction in patients with uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

机译:在患有罕见的房室结折返性心动过速的患者中,顺行缓慢途径与反向执行的逆行缓慢途径不同。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Slow Pathways in Uncommon AVNRT. Introduction: The aim of this study was to examine the location of anterograde and retrograde slow pathways in 16 patients with uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), including the fast-slow form in 10, slow-slow form in 5, and both fast-slow and slow-slow forms in 1. Methods and Results: Patients were divided into two groups according to the approach used for slow pathway ablation in the initial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA): one approach used earliest atrial activation during tachycardia (ES group, n = 9), and the other used a slow potential during sinus rhythm (SP group, n = 7). When the initial RFCA failed to eliminate slow pathway conduction in the ES group, an additional RFCA guided by a slow potential was performed. The ratio of lengths from the His-bundle region to the RFCA site and coronary sinus ostium (Abl/His-CS ratio) and the ratio of amplitudes of atrial and ventricular potentials at the RFCA site (A/V ratio) were comparedbetween the two groups. In the initial RFCA, retrograde slow pathway conduction was eliminated without impairment of anterograde slow pathway conduction in 8 (89%) patients from the ES group, and bidirectional slow pathway conduction was eliminated in 6 (86%) patients from the SP group. Residual anterograde slow pathway conduction that was preserved after the initial RFCA in 8 of 9 patients was eliminated by an additional slow potential-guided RFCA. Both the Abl/His-CS ratio (0.86 +/- 0.07 vs 0.73 +/- 0.11, P = 0.01) and A/V ratio (0.80 +/- 0.31 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.01, P < 0.001) were higher in the ES group than the SP group. The ratios for the residual anterograde slow pathway ablation in the ES group were similar to those in the SP group. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the retrograde slow pathway runs more on the atrial side of the tricuspid valve annulus at the level of the coronary sinus ostium compared with the anterograde slow pathway, although both pathways run parallel or are fused in portions more proximal to the His bundle. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 722-727, July 2003)
机译:AVNRT中常见的慢速通道。简介:这项研究的目的是检查16例罕见的房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者的顺行和逆行慢路径的位置,包括快慢形式10,慢慢形式5和快-slow和慢-slow形式1。方法和结果:根据初始射频导管消融(RFCA)中用于慢路径消融的方法,将患者分为两组:一种在心动过速中最早用于房颤激活的方法(ES组) ,n = 9),另一个在窦性心律期间使用了缓慢的电位(SP组,n = 7)。当最初的RFCA无法消除ES组中的慢通道传导时,将执行由慢电位引导的额外RFCA。比较了两者之间从His束区域到RFCA部位和冠状窦口的长度之比(Abl / His-CS比)和在RFCA部位的房室电位和心室电位振幅之比(A / V比)。组。在最初的RFCA中,ES组的8名患者(89%)消除了逆行慢通路传导,而没有顺行性慢通路传导的损害,而SP组的6名患者(86%)消除了双向慢通路传导。最初的RFCA在9名患者中有8名在最初的RFCA之后保留的残余顺行性慢通道传导被另一种缓慢的电势引导的RFCA消除。 Abl / His-CS比(0.86 +/- 0.07对0.73 +/- 0.11,P = 0.01)和A / V比(0.80 +/- 0.31对0.14 +/- 0.01,P <0.001)都更高在ES组中比在SP组中。 ES组残余顺行性慢路径消融的比率与SP组相似。结论:这项研究的结果表明,与顺行慢通道相比,逆行慢通道在冠状窦口水平处在三尖瓣环的房侧运行更多,尽管两种途径平行或部分融合。靠近他的捆绑包。 (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,Vol.14,pp.722-727,2003年7月)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号