首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cancer education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education >Evaluating postgraduate public health and biomedical training program outcomes:: Lost opportunities and renewed interest
【24h】

Evaluating postgraduate public health and biomedical training program outcomes:: Lost opportunities and renewed interest

机译:评估研究生公共卫生和生物医学培训计划的成果::失去机会并重新产生兴趣

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To identify recent studies in the scientific literature that evaluated structured postgraduate public health and biomedical training programs and reported career outcomes among individual trainees, a comprehensive search of several databases was conducted to identify published studies in English between January 1995 and January 2012. Studies of interest included those that evaluated career outcomes for trainees completing full-time public health or biomedical training programs of at least 12 months duration, with structured training offered on-site. Of the over 600 articles identified, only 13 met the inclusion criteria. Six studies evaluated US federal agency programs and six were of university-based programs. Seven programs were solely or predominantly of physicians, with only one consisting mainly of PhDs. Most studies used a cohort or cross-sectional design. The studies were mainly descriptive, with only four containing statistical data. Type of employment was the most common outcome measure (n = 12) and number of scientific publications (n = 6) was second. The lack of outcomes evaluation data from postgraduate public health and biomedical training programs in the published literature is a lost opportunity for understanding the career paths of trainees and the potential impact of training programs. Suggestions for increasing interest in conducting and reporting evaluation studies of these structured postgraduate training programs are provided.
机译:为了确定科学文献中最近的研究,这些研究评估了结构化的研究生公共卫生和生物医学培训计划,并报告了单个受训者的职业发展成果,对多个数据库进行了全面搜索,以鉴定1995年1月至2012年1月之间英语发表的研究。包括那些为完成了至少12个月持续时间的全日制公共卫生或生物医学培训计划的受训人员评估职业成就的培训,并提供现场结构化培训。在确定的600篇文章中,只有13篇符合纳入标准。六项研究评估了美国联邦机构计划,六项是大学计划。七个程序完全或主要由医师组成,只有一个主要由博士学位组成。大多数研究使用队列或横断面设计。这些研究主要是描述性的,只有四个包含统计数据。雇用类型是最常见的结果指标(n = 12),科学出版物的数量(n = 6)次之。在已发表的文献中缺乏来自研究生公共卫生和生物医学培训计划的结果评估数据,这是失去了了解受训者职业道路和培训计划潜在影响的机会。提供了对进行和报告这些结构化的研究生培训计划的评估研究越来越感兴趣的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号