...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Institutional variability in red blood cell conservation practices for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Institutions of the MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group.
【24h】

Institutional variability in red blood cell conservation practices for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Institutions of the MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group.

机译:冠状动脉旁路移植手术的红细胞保存实践中的制度差异。围手术期缺血研究小组多中心研究机构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether substantial institutional variability exists in red blood cell conservation practices associated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized patient enrollment and data collection. SETTING: Twenty-four U.S. academic institutions participating in the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia. PARTICIPANTS: A well-defined subset of primary CABG surgery patients (n = 713) expected to be at low risk for bleeding and exposure to allogeneic transfusion. INTERVENTIONS: None (observational study). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Frequency of use of red blood cell conservation techniques was determined among institutions. Correlation was determined between use of each technique and transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells and between use of each technique and median institutional blood loss. Significant variability (p < 0.01) was detected in institutional transfusion practice with respect to the use of predonated autologous whole blood, normovolemic hemodilution, red cell salvage, and reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood. The frequency of institutional use of these techniques was not associated with allogeneic transfusion (r2 < 0.15) or blood loss (r2 < 0.10) in the low-risk population of patients examined. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions vary significantly in perioperative blood conservation practices for CABG surgery. Further study to determine the appropriate use of these techniques is warranted.
机译:目的:评估与冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)相关的红细胞保存实践中是否存在实质性的制度差异。设计:前瞻性,随机的患者入组和数据收集。地点:二十四个美国学术机构参与了围手术期缺血的多中心研究。参与者:一组明确定义的原发性CABG手术患者(n = 713)预计出血和接触异体输血的风险较低。干预措施:无(观察研究)。测量和主要结果:在各机构之间确定了红细胞保存技术的使用频率。确定了每种技术的使用与同种异体红细胞输血之间的相关性,以及每种技术的使用与中位机构失血之间的相关性。在机构输血实践中,在使用预先捐赠的自体全血,正常血液稀释,红细胞抢救和流回纵隔血液方面发现了显着的差异(p <0.01)。在接受检查的低风险患者中,这些技术的机构使用频率与同种异体输血(r2 <0.15)或失血(r2 <0.10)没有关系。结论:CABG手术围手术期血液保存实践的机构差异很大。有必要进一步研究以确定这些技术的适当用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号