首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Direct observation of the human microcirculation during cardiopulmonary bypass: effects of pulsatile perfusion.
【24h】

Direct observation of the human microcirculation during cardiopulmonary bypass: effects of pulsatile perfusion.

机译:直接观察人体外循环过程中的微循环:搏动性灌注的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Possible benefits of pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass often are attributed to enhanced microvascular flow. However, there is no evidence to support this in humans. Therefore, the authors assessed whether pulsatile perfusion alters human microvascular flow. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized observational crossover study. SETTING: A tertiary cardiothoracic surgery referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen patients undergoing routine cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent both pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in random order. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors used sidestream dark-field imaging to record video clips of the sublingual human microcirculation. Perfusion was started either in the pulsatile (n = 8) or the nonpulsatile mode. After 10 minutes, microvascular recordings were made. The perfusion mode was then switched, and after 10 minutes, new microvascular recordings were taken. The authors quantified pulsatile perfusion-generated surplus hemodynamic energy by calculating pulse pressure and energy-equivalent pressure. Microvascular analysis included determination of the perfused vessel density (mean +/- standard deviation). This did not differ between nonpulsatile and pulsatile perfusion (6.65 +/- 1.39 v 6.83 +/- 1.23 mm(-1), p = 0.58, and 2.16 +/- 0.64 v 1.96 +/- 0.48 mm(-1), p = 0.20 for small and large microvessels, respectively, cutoff diameter = 20 mum). Pulse pressure and energy-equivalent pressure was higher during pulsatile perfusion. However, there was no correlation between the difference in energy-equivalent pressure or pulse pressure and perfused vessel density (r = -0.43, p = 0.13, and r = -0.09, p = 0.76, respectively). CONCLUSION: Pulsatile perfusion does not alter human microvascular perfusion using standard equipment in routine cardiac surgery. Changes in pulse pressure or energy-equivalent pressure bear no obvious relationship with microcirculatory parameters.
机译:目的:在体外循环期间进行脉搏灌注的可能的益处通常归因于微血管流量的增加。但是,没有证据支持人类。因此,作者评估了搏动性灌注是否会改变人的微血管流量。设计:一项前瞻性,随机观察性交叉研究。地点:三级心胸外科转诊中心。参与者:16例接受常规心肺搭桥手术的患者。干预:所有患者均随机接受搏动性和非搏动性灌注。测量和主要结果:作者使用侧流暗场成像来记录人类舌下微循环的视频片段。灌注以搏动(n = 8)或非搏动模式开始。 10分钟后,进行微血管记录。然后切换灌注模式,并在10分钟后拍摄新的微血管记录。作者通过计算脉搏压力和能量当量压力来量化脉动灌注产生的剩余血流动力学能量。微血管分析包括灌注血管密度的测定(平均值+/-标准偏差)。非搏动性和搏动性灌注之间无差异(6.65 +/- 1.39 v 6.83 +/- 1.23 mm(-1),p = 0.58和2.16 +/- 0.64 v 1.96 +/- 0.48 mm(-1),p对于小和大的微血管,分别为= 0.20,截止直径= 20毫米)。在搏动性灌注期间,脉压和能量当量压较高。但是,能量当量压力或脉冲压力的差异与灌注血管密度之间没有相关性(r = -0.43,p = 0.13,r = -0.09,p = 0.76)。结论:在常规心脏手术中,脉冲灌注不会改变使用标准设备进行的人微血管灌注。脉压或等效能量压力的变化与微循环参数无明显关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号