首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Albumin versus crystalloid for pump priming in cardiac surgery: Meta-analysis of controlled trials.
【24h】

Albumin versus crystalloid for pump priming in cardiac surgery: Meta-analysis of controlled trials.

机译:白蛋白与晶体在心脏外科手术中的泵启动:对照试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: To determine the effects of pump priming fluid choice on platelets, fluid balance, and clinical outcomes. Design: Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Primary endpoints were platelet counts, colloid oncotic pressure, on-bypass fluid balance, postoperative weight gain, and colloid usage. Setting: Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients: Adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery, including coronary artery bypass grafting, valve procedures, and correction of congenital cardiac anomalies. Interventions: Extracorporeal circuit priming with either albumin or crystalloid. Measurements and Results: The meta-analysis included 21 controlled trials with 1,346 total patients. Albumin prime significantly reduced the on-bypass drop in platelet counts. The pooled weighted mean difference in platelet count drop with albumin versus crystalloid prime was -23.8 x 10(9)/L (confidence interval [CI], -42.8 to -4.7 x 10(9)/L). The colloid oncotic pressure decline was also smaller when albumin rather than crystalloid was used for priming, with a pooled weighted mean difference of -3.6 mm Hg (CI, -4.8 to -2.3 mmHg) during bypass and -2.0 mmHg (CI, -2.9 to -1.1 mmHg) after surgery. Albumin prime correspondingly reduced on-bypass positive fluid balance (-584 mL; CI, -819 to -348 mL) and postoperative weight gain (-1.0 kg; CI, -0.6 to -1.3 kg) compared with crystalloid. Postoperative colloid usage was lower with albumin than crystalloid prime (-612 mL; CI, -983 to -241 mL). Conclusions: Albumin prime better preserves platelet counts than crystalloid. Albumin also favorably influences colloid oncotic pressure, on-bypass positive fluid balance, postoperative weight gain, and colloid usage. The clinical significance of these observations merits further investigation.
机译:目的:确定泵灌注液选择对血小板,体液平衡和临床结果的影响。设计:对照临床试验的荟萃分析。主要终点为血小板计数,胶体渗透压,旁通液平衡,术后体重增加和胶体使用量。地点:心脏外科手术,体外循环。患者:接受心脏手术的成年和儿科患者,包括冠状动脉搭桥术,瓣膜手术以及先天性心脏异常的矫正。干预措施:用白蛋白或晶体注射体外循环。测量和结果:荟萃分析包括21项对照试验,共1,346名患者。白蛋白素显着减少了血小板计数的旁路下降。与白蛋白和晶体素相比,血小板计数下降的合并加权平均差为-23.8 x 10(9)/ L(置信区间[CI],-42.8至-4.7 x 10(9)/ L)。当使用白蛋白而不是晶状体进行引发时,胶体渗透压下降也较小,旁路期间的加权加权平均差为-3.6 mm Hg(CI,-4.8至-2.3 mmHg),而-2.0 mmHg(CI,-2.9)至-1.1 mmHg)。与晶体相比,白蛋白引发剂相应减少了旁路的正液平衡(-584 mL; CI,-819至-348 mL)和术后体重增加(-1.0 kg; CI,-0.6至-1.3 kg)。术后使用白蛋白的胶体用量要低于使用晶体白胶的用量(-612 mL; CI,-983至-241 mL)。结论:白蛋白素能比晶体素更好地保存血小板计数。白蛋白还有利地影响胶体渗透压,旁路正液平衡,术后体重增加和胶体使用。这些观察的临床意义值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号