首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiology >Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by the axius auto ejection fraction method: comparison with manual trace method and visual assessment of ejection fraction
【24h】

Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by the axius auto ejection fraction method: comparison with manual trace method and visual assessment of ejection fraction

机译:采用轴突自动射血分数法的左心室容积和射血分数:与手动示踪法的比较以及对射血分数的目测评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Visual assessment of the ejection fraction (EF) is often used in clinical practice, but is subjective and requires training and experience. The auto EF method has been newly developed for automated detection of the left ventricular (LV) endocardial border throughout the cardiac cycle. The clinical feasibility was assessed of the auto EF method for measuring LV volumes and EF in patients. Manually traced EF measured by the biplane modified Simpson's rule was used as the reference standard. METHODS: The study population consisted of 30 consecutive patients with normal sinus rhythm. All patients underwent two-dimensional echocardiography. The auto EF method incorporated pattern and shape recognition to automatically locate the LV, track the endocardium, and calculate EF from routine digital images. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and EF measured by the auto EF method were compared those by the manually traced method. LVEF by the Auto EF method was also compared with visual EF determined by nonattending physicians. RESULTS: Auto EF was more reproducible than visual EF by the expert reader. LVEF by the auto EF method had excellent correlation and close limits of agreement with manually traced EF compared with visual EF(4-chamber view: y = 1.10 x - 4.28, r = 0.94, bias = 1.6%, 2-chamber view: y = 0.88 x + 7.25, r = 0.90, bias = 0.4%). LV volumes by the auto EF method underestimated those by manually traced EF (end-diastolic volume by 4-chamber view: y = 0.72 x + 8.92, r = 0.93, bias = - 16.7 ml, end-systolic volume by 4-chamber view: y = 0.82 x - 0.97, r = 0.98, bias = - 8.5 ml, end-diastolic volume by 2-chamber view: y = 0.73 x + 12.4, r = 0.82, bias = - 12.3 ml, end-systolic volume by 2-chamber view: y = 0.65 x + 6.94, r = 0.90, bias = - 6.8 ml). CONCLUSIONS: The auto EF method is a clinically useful tool for the measurement of LV volumes and EF.
机译:目的:视觉评估射血分数(EF)通常用于临床实践,但是主观的,需要训练和经验。自动EF方法是新开发的,用于在整个心动周期中自动检测左心室(LV)心内膜边界。评估了自动EF方法测量患者左室容量和EF的临床可行性。通过双翼飞机改进的辛普森法则测量的手动跟踪的EF被用作参考标准。方法:研究人群包括30例窦性心律正常的患者。所有患者均进行了二维超声心动图检查。自动EF方法结合了模式和形状识别功能,可自动定位LV,跟踪心内膜并根据常规数字图像计算EF。比较通过自动EF方法测得的LV舒张末期和收缩末期容积和EF,以及通过手动追踪方法测得的EF。还通过自动EF方法将LVEF与无主治医师确定的视觉EF进行了比较。结果:专家阅读器比视觉EF具有更高的可重复性。与视觉EF相比,通过自动EF方法进行的LVEF与手动跟踪EF的相关性和一致性接近极限(4腔视图:y = 1.10 x-4.28,r = 0.94,偏差= 1.6%,2腔视图:y = 0.88 x + 7.25,r = 0.90,偏差= 0.4%)。通过自动EF方法测得的LV体积低估了通过手动追踪EF测得的LV体积(通过4腔镜观察的舒张末期容积:y = 0.72 x + 8.92,r = 0.93,偏差=-16.7 ml,通过4腔镜观察的收缩末期容积:y = 0.82 x-0.97,r = 0.98,偏差=-8.5 ml,舒张末期容积通过2腔镜观察:y = 0.73 x + 12.4,r = 0.82,偏差=-12.3 ml,收缩末期容积通过2室视图:y = 0.65 x + 6.94,r = 0.90,偏差=-6.8 ml)。结论:自动EF方法是一种临床有用的工具,可用于测量LV量和EF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号