首页> 外文期刊>Clinical infectious diseases >Spectrum of microbial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients: implications for selection of the population for enrollment in clinical trials.
【24h】

Spectrum of microbial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients: implications for selection of the population for enrollment in clinical trials.

机译:住院患者社区获得性肺炎的微生物病原学谱:选择临床试验人群的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The title of this article implies that knowledge of the etiological pathogen may be useful in selection of patients for clinical trials for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, this remains to be seen. The clinical course of a patient with CAP admitted to the hospital but not to the intensive care unit depends on a number of variables, including the patient, the pathogen, and the hospital itself. The site-of-care decision can be based on 1 of 2 prediction rules. Neither of these rules, however, correlates with the etiology of CAP, and it is not clear whether they can be used to stratify patients according to prognostic factors. A pathogen may be found in only approximately one-third of hospitalized patients with CAP overall. An etiological diagnosis is more likely to be made for patients with CAP who are hospitalized in the intensive care unit (39%) than for those hospitalized in other wards (20%). The issue of randomization to treatment regimens and possible approaches to randomization are discussed. It seems clear, however, that randomization would have to take place immediately after entry of the patient into the study. The possibility of using risks for specific pathogens or risks for antimicrobial resistance is also addressed. However, there are no data to support the use of such risks as prognostic factors in CAP. The best approach for noninferiority trials involving hospitalized patients with CAP is to randomize patients who meet the inclusion criteria and to stratify them by hospital site, with block randomization within each site. Stratification by site takes into account local epidemiology and can balance differences in unmeasured confounders among sites.
机译:本文的标题暗示,病原体病原体的知识可能在选择社区获得性肺炎(CAP)临床试验的患者时有用。但是,这仍有待观察。 CAP住院但未进入重症监护室的CAP患者的临床病程取决于许多变量,包括患者,病原体和医院本身。护理地点决策可以基于2条预测规则中的1条。但是,这两个规则均与CAP的病因无关,目前尚不清楚是否可以根据预后因素将其用于对患者进行分层。总体上只有约三分之一的CAP住院患者中发现病原体。重症监护病房住院的CAP患者(39%)比其他病房住院的CAP患者(20%)更有可能进行病因诊断。讨论了治疗方案的随机化问题和可能的随机化方法。但是,很明显,必须在患者进入研究后立即进行随机分组。还解决了对特定病原体使用风险或对抗菌素耐药性使用风险的可能性。但是,没有数据支持将此类风险用作CAP中的预后因素。对于参与住院的CAP患者的非劣效性试验,最好的方法是将符合纳入标准的患者随机分组,并按医院部位进行分层,并在每个部位随机分组。站点分层考虑了本地流行病学,可以平衡站点之间无法衡量的混杂因素之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号