...
【24h】

Are dentin posts biomechanically intensive?: A laboratory and FEA study

机译:牙本质的生物力学强度高吗?:一项实验室和FEA研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The goal of this laboratory and finite elemental stress analysis (FEA) study was to compare fracture strength of dentin post (DP) with stainless steel and glass fiber posts. Single-rooted teeth were decoronated and restored with ParaPost (PP), i-TFC (TFC), and DPs (n=10). Resin cores were created and loaded until failure (1.0mm/min). The data were analyzed (ANOVA, Tukey, Chi-Square tests). Three-dimensional FEA models of the posts were created and the stress distributions were calculated using Solid Works/Cosmos works structural analysis program. A significant difference was found among the groups (p<0.001). TFC group showed the highest and the DP group showed the lowest fracture resistance (p<0.001). PP created more stress at the root dentin and inside the post. Restoration of roots with glass fiber and DPs may reduce stresses within the core material and the remaining root. However, a fracture-resistant restoration cannot be achieved by using a DP.
机译:该实验室和有限元应力分析(FEA)研究的目的是比较牙本质桩(DP)与不锈钢和玻璃纤维桩的断裂强度。使用ParaPost(PP),i-TFC(TFC)和DP(n = 10)对单根牙齿进行了修饰和修复。创建并加载树脂芯,直到发生故障(1.0mm / min)。分析数据(ANOVA,Tukey,卡方检验)。建立了三维三维有限元模型,并使用Solid Works / Cosmos Works结构分析程序计算了应力分布。在各组之间发现了显着差异(p <0.001)。 TFC组表现出最高的抗断裂性,而DP组表现出最低的抗断裂性(p <0.001)。 PP在牙本质根和内部产生更多压力。用玻璃纤维和DP修复根系可以减少核心材料和其余根系内的应力。然而,通过使用DP不能实现抗断裂修复。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号