...
【24h】

Shear bond strengths of five intraoral porcelain repair systems

机译:五个口腔瓷修复系统的剪切粘结强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In fixed prosthodontics,fracture of the porcelain veneer is not an uncommon problem under clinical conditions due to,e.g.,malfunction,trauma or technical failures.To avoid time-consuming and cost-intensive renewal of the entire restoration,repair of the chipped veneer is desirable.The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of five intraoral porcelain repair kits based on different chemical bonding systems.45 metal plates veneered with feldspathic porcelain were fabricated.The surface treatment was performed using five porcelain repair systems based on tribochemical silica coating (Cojet),mechanical roughening (Silistor,Cimara,Ceramic Repair) or etching (Clearfil Repair) followed by application of silane coupling agents (five specimens each).Cylinders of composite resin of Charisma and Pertac Hybrid were bonded using Cojet,Silistor,Cimara and Ceramic Repair,and of Clearfil AP-X with Clearfil Repair onto the porcelain specimens.After thermocycling (5000 cycles,5-55°C) shear bond strength was measured according to ISO 10477 followed by assessment of the failure mode.Statistical analysis was carried out with one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni-Dunn's multiple comparisons post-hoc analysis for test groups (alpha=0.05).Shear bond strengths higher than 10 MPa were found for all test groups except for Ceramic Repair with Pertac Hybrid (8.1 ± 1.3 MPa),which was significantly lower than all other groups (P < 0.05).Highest shear bond strength was found for Silistor with Charisma (23.1 ± 5.8 MPa),which was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than all other groups except Cojet with Charisma (17.8 ± 3.6 MPa) and Clearfil Repair (20.3 ±5.0 MPa).Cojet and Silistor with Charisma,Cimara,as well as with Clearfil mainly showed cohesive or mixed failure modes (cohesive and interfacial).Bond strengths of the combinations Silistor-Charisma,Clearfil Repair-Clearfil AP-X and Cojet-Charisma were superior to all other combinations used in the present tests.
机译:在固定的修复术中,由于功能失调,创伤或技术故障等原因,瓷贴面的断裂在临床情况下并不常见。为避免整个修复体耗时且成本高昂的更新,切屑贴面的维修是这项体外研究的目的是评估基于不同化学结合系统的五种口腔内瓷修复套件的剪切结合强度。制造了45块长石瓷贴面金属板。使用五种基于瓷修复系统的表面处理在摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层(Cojet)上进行机械粗糙化(Silistor,Cimara,陶瓷修复)或蚀刻(Clearfil修复),然后施加硅烷偶联剂(每个五个样品)。将Charisma和Pertac Hybrid的复合树脂圆柱体通过Cojet粘结,Silistor,Cimara和陶瓷修复,以及带有Clearfil修复的Clearfil AP-X到瓷器样品上。热循环后(5000次(5-55°C),根据ISO 10477测量剪切粘结强度,然后评估破坏模式。使用单向方差分析和Bonferroni-Dunn对试验组事后分析进行多重比较进行统计分析(α = 0.05)。除Pertac Hybrid陶瓷修复剂(8.1±1.3 MPa)外,所有测试组的剪切粘结强度均高于10 MPa,明显低于所有其他组(P <0.05)。发现具有魅力的Silistor(23.1±5.8 MPa),显着高于(P <0.05)除带有Coisma的Cojet(17.8±3.6 MPa)和Clearfil Repair(20.3±5.0 MPa)以外的所有其他组。 ,Cimara和Clearfil主要表现出内聚或混合破坏模式(内聚和界面)。Silistor-Charisma,Clearfil Repair-Clearfil AP-X和Cojet-Charisma组合的粘结强度均优于所有其他组合。目前的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号