首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research >Comparison of Two ELISA Methods and Mass Spectrometry for Measurement of Vitamin D-Binding Protein: Implications for the Assessment of Bioavailable Vitamin D Concentrations Across Genotypes
【24h】

Comparison of Two ELISA Methods and Mass Spectrometry for Measurement of Vitamin D-Binding Protein: Implications for the Assessment of Bioavailable Vitamin D Concentrations Across Genotypes

机译:两种ELISA方法和质谱法测量维生素D结合蛋白的比较:评估跨基因型的生物有效性维生素D浓度的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Studies using vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) concentrations to estimate free and bioavailable vitamin D have increased dramatically in recent years. Combinations of two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) produce three major DBP isoforms (Gc1f, Gc1s, and Gc2). A recent study showed that DBP concentrations quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) did not differ by race, whereas a widely used monoclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantified DBP differentially by isoform, yielding significantly lower DBP concentrations in black versus white individuals. We compared measurements of serum DBP using a monoclonal ELISA, a polyclonal ELISA, and LC-MS/MS in 125 participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC). Serum free and bioavailable 25OHD were calculated based on DBP concentrations from these three assays in homozygous participants, and race differences were compared. We confirmed that the monoclonal ELISA quantifies DBP differentially by isoform and showed that the polyclonal ELISA is not subject to this bias. Whereas 9% of the variability in DBP concentrations quantified using either LC-MS/MS or the polyclonal ELISA was explained by genotype, 85% of the variability in the monoclonal ELISA-based measures was explained by genotype. DBP concentrations measured by the monoclonal ELISA were disproportionately lower than LC-MS/MS-based results for Gc1f homozygotes (median difference -67%; interquartile range [IQR] -71%, -64%), 95% of whom were black. In contrast, the polyclonal ELISA yielded consistently and similarly higher measurements of DBP than LC-MS/MS, irrespective of genotype, with a median percent difference of +50% (IQR +33%, +65%). Contrary to findings using the monoclonal ELISA, DBP concentrations did not differ by race, and free and bioavailable 25OHD were significantly lower in black versus white participants based on both the polyclonal ELISA and LC-MS/MS, consistent with their lower total 25OHD. Future studies of DBP and free or bioavailable vitamin D metabolites should employ DBP assays that are not biased by DBP genotype. (c) 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
机译:近年来,使用维生素D结合蛋白(DBP)浓度估算游离和可生物利用的维生素D的研究急剧增加。两个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的组合产生三个主要的DBP亚型(Gc1f,Gc1s和Gc2)。最近的一项研究表明,通过液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS / MS)量化的DBP浓度在种族上没有差异,而广泛使用的单克隆酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)通过同工型对DBP进行差异化定量分析,结果明显降低黑人与白人个体的DBP浓度。我们在125名慢性肾功能不全队列(CRIC)的参与者中比较了使用单克隆ELISA,多克隆ELISA和LC-MS / MS对血清DBP的测量。基于纯合子实验中这三种测定的DBP浓度,计算无血清和可利用的25OHD,并比较种族差异。我们确认单克隆ELISA通过同工型差异化地定量DBP,并表明多克隆ELISA不受此偏倚。使用基因型解释了使用LC-MS / MS或多克隆ELISA定量得到的DBP浓度的9%的变异,而基于单克隆ELISA的测量方法中的85%的变异是由基因型解释。对于Gc1f纯合子,通过单克隆ELISA测量的DBP浓度远远低于基于LC-MS / MS的结果(中位数差异为-67%;四分位间距[IQR] -71%,-64%),其中95%为黑色。相反,无论基因型如何,多克隆ELISA均比LC-MS / MS产生一致且相似的DBP测量值,中位数差异为+ 50%(IQR +33%,+ 65%)。与使用单克隆ELISA的发现相反,基于多克隆ELISA和LC-MS / MS,黑人参与者的游离和可生物利用的25OHD的DBP浓度明显低于白人,这与他们较低的总25OHD一致。 DBP和游离或可生物利用的维生素D代谢物的未来研究应采用不受DBP基因型影响的DBP分析方法。 (c)2016年美国骨矿物质研究学会。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号