首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Brand Management >Are food brands that carry light claims different?
【24h】

Are food brands that carry light claims different?

机译:具有轻声宣称的食品品牌是否有所不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Little is known about the market performance of brands that carry light claims (for example low fat, low sugar) in comparison to their regular counterparts. In order to fill this gap, we explore whether light brands perform similarly to regular brands in terms of (a) brand performance measures (BPMs), such as market share (MS) and penetration, (b) loyalty levels, and (c) customer sharing. We analyse three product categories (cola, flavoured carbonated beverages and margarine) using UK household panel data provided by Kantar. The results show that when considering standard BPMs (that is MS, penetration and purchase frequency), regular brands receive higher BPMs than light brands. However, when considering repeat purchase loyalty, light brands achieve greater levels of loyalty than their regular counterparts. Finally, light brands share their buyers more with each other than expected, suggesting the existence of market partitions, although these are not isolated as buyers of these brands still buy regular brands.
机译:与普通品牌相比,声称轻量品牌(例如低脂,低糖)的品牌的市场表现知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们在(a)品牌绩效指标(BPM),例如市场份额(MS)和渗透率,(b)忠诚度水平和(c)客户共享。我们使用Kantar提供的英国家庭面板数据分析了三种产品类别(可乐,碳酸饮料和人造黄油)。结果表明,在考虑标准BPM(即MS,渗透率和购买频率)时,常规品牌的BPM比轻品牌更高。但是,在考虑重复购买忠诚度时,轻品牌的忠诚度要高于其常规品牌。最后,轻型品牌之间的买家份额比预期的要多,这表明存在市场划分,尽管这些划分不是孤立的,因为这些品牌的买家仍在购买常规品牌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号