首页> 外文期刊>Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association >Employment outcomes after burn injury: a comparison of those burned at work and those burned outside of work.
【24h】

Employment outcomes after burn injury: a comparison of those burned at work and those burned outside of work.

机译:烧伤后的就业结果:工作中烧伤与工作外烧伤的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares employment rates and barriers to return to work in subjects burned at work with those burned outside of work. Further, this study examines the influence of electrical etiology on return to work outcomes. The electronic records of burn survivors treated at a Regional Burn Center outpatient clinic from 2001 to 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included employment at the time of burn injury and age of 18 years or older. Demographic and medical data were collected. Documentation of barriers to return to work was reviewed and classified into eight categories. Return to employment was grouped into four time intervals: 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 12, and greater than 12 months after injury. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of unemployment at greater than 1 year for subjects burned at work, outside of work, and those burned at work without electric injury. The authors identified 197 patients for inclusion in the study. Their age was 37 +/- 0.8 years (mean +/- SEM), and TBSA burned was 16 +/- 1%. Fifty percent of subjects were burned at work. Electric etiology was seen only in those burned at work (n = 24). Forty-four percent (n = 43) of subjects injured at work remained unemployed at 1 year compared with 22% (n = 22) of subjects injured outside of work. The most frequent employment barriers included pain (72%), neurologic problems (62%), and psychiatric problems (53%) for those burned at work; and pain (63%), neurologic problems (59%), and impaired mobility (54%) for those burned outside of work. Significant predictors of unemployment at greater than 12 months included burn at work, pain, impaired mobility, other medical problems, and inpatient rehabilitation (P < .05). When the electrical injury subjects are removed from the analysis, significant predictors of unemployment at 12 months include burn at work, pain, inpatient rehabilitation, and length of stay (P < .05). Burn survivors experience multiple complex barriers in returning to work. Burn at work is a significant predictor of unemployment at 1 year even after controlling for electric etiology. Further study is required to better understand the influence of work setting on employment outcomes.
机译:这项研究比较了在工作中燃烧的对象和在工作以外燃烧的对象的就业率和重返工作的障碍。此外,本研究考察了电气病因学对恢复工作成果的影响。回顾性地回顾了2001年至2007年间在区域烧伤中心门诊就诊的烧伤幸存者的电子记录。纳入标准包括烧伤时的工作以及年龄在18岁以上。收集了人口和医学数据。审查了重返工作障碍的文件,并将其分为八类。重返工作分为四个时间间隔:受伤后0到3、3到6、6到12和大于12个月。 Logistic回归分析用于确定在工作场所,工作场所以外和没有电击的情况下工作的对象在一年以上的失业情况。作者确定了197例患者纳入研究。他们的年龄为37 +/- 0.8岁(平均+/- SEM),烧过的TBSA为16 +/- 1%。 50%的受试者在工作中被烧伤。仅在工作中被烧伤的人中发现了电气病因(n = 24)。在工作中受伤的受试者中有百分之四十四(n = 43)在一年后仍然失业,而在工作之外受伤的受试者中只有22%(n = 22)。最常见的就业障碍包括工作中被烧伤的人员的疼痛(72%),神经系统问题(62%)和精神病问题(53%);工作之外烧伤的人的疼痛和疼痛(63%),神经系统问题(59%)和行动不便(54%)。超过12个月的失业的重要预测指标包括工作烧伤,疼痛,行动不便,其他医疗问题和住院康复(P <.05)。当将电击伤对象从分析中移除后,12个月时失业的重要预测因素包括工作时烧伤,疼痛,住院康复和住院时间(P <.05)。烧伤幸存者在重返工作中会遇到多种复杂的障碍。即使控制电气病因,在工作中烧伤仍是1年失业的重要预测指标。需要进一步研究,以更好地了解工作环境对就业成果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号