...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >Patient-specific mean pressure drop in the systemic arterial tree, a comparison between 1-D and 3-D models
【24h】

Patient-specific mean pressure drop in the systemic arterial tree, a comparison between 1-D and 3-D models

机译:全身动脉树中患者特定的平均压降,一维和三维模型之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One-dimensional models of the systemic arterial tree are useful tools for studying wave propagation phenomena, however, their formulation for frictional losses is approximate and often based on solutions for developed flow in straight non-tapered arterial segments. Thus, losses due to bifurcations, tortuosity, non-planarity and complex geometry effects cannot be accounted for in 1-D models. This may lead to errors in the estimation of mean pressure. To evaluate these errors, we simulated steady flow in a patient specific model of the entire systemic circulation using a standard CFD code with Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood properties and compared the pressure evolution along three principal and representative arterial pathlines with the prediction of mean pressure, as given by the 1-D model. Pressure drop computed from aortic root up to iliac bifurcation and to distal brachial is less than 1. mmHg and 1-D model predictions agree well with the 3-D model. In smaller vessels like the precerebral and cerebral arteries, the losses are higher (mean pressure drop over 10. mmHg from mean aortic pressure) and are consistently underestimated by the 1-D model. Complex flow patterns resulting from tortuosity, non-planarity and branching yield shear stresses, which are higher than the ones predicted by the 1-D model. In consequence, the 1-D model overestimates mean pressure in peripheral arteries and especially in the cerebral circulation.
机译:全身动脉树的一维模型是研究波浪传播现象的有用工具,但是,它们的摩擦损失公式是近似的,并且通常基于直的非锥形动脉节段中已发展流动的解。因此,在一维模型中不能考虑由于分叉,曲折,非平面性和复杂的几何效应造成的损失。这可能会导致平均压力估算中的错误。为了评估这些误差,我们使用具有牛顿和非牛顿血液特性的标准CFD代码在整个系统循环的患者特定模型中模拟稳定流量,并将沿三个主要和代表动脉路径的压力变化与平均压力预测进行了比较,由一维模型给出。从主动脉根到分叉和肱骨远端的压降小于1 mmHg,1-D模型的预测与3-D模型非常吻合。在较小的血管(如脑前和脑动脉)中,损失较高(平均主动脉压下降了10 mmHg以上的平均压力),并且一维模型始终低估了这种损失。由曲折度,非平面度和分支屈服剪切应力产生的复杂流型,比一维模型预测的要高。因此,一维模型高估了周围动脉特别是脑循环中的平均压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号