首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies >Effectiveness of Myofascial release in the management of chronic low back pain in nursing professionals
【24h】

Effectiveness of Myofascial release in the management of chronic low back pain in nursing professionals

机译:肌筋膜释放在护理专业人员中治疗慢性下腰痛的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To investigate whether Myofascial release (MFR) when used as an adjunct to specific back exercises (SBE) reduces pain and disability in chronic low back pain (CLBP) in comparison with a control group receiving a sham Myofascial release (SMFR) and specific back exercises (SBE) among nursing professionals. Design: Randomized, controlled, single blinded trial. Setting: Nonprofit research foundation clinic in Kerala, India. Participants: Nursing professionals (N=80) with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Interventions: MFR group or control group. The techniques were administered by physiotherapists certified in MFR and consisted of 24 sessions per client over 8 weeks. Main outcome measure: The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) was used to assess subjective pain experience and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) was used to assess the disability associated with CLBP. The primary outcome measure was the difference in MPQ and QBPDS scores between week 1 (pretest score), week 8 (posttest score), and follow-up at week 12 after randomization. Results: The simple main effects analysis showed that the MFR group performed better than the control group in weeks 8 and 12 (P<0.005). The patients in the MFR group reported a 53.3% reduction in their pain and 29.7% reduction in functional disability as shown in the MPQ and QBPDS scores in week 8, whereas patients in the control group reported a 26.1% and 9.8% reduction in their MPQ and QBPDS scores in week 8, which persisted as a 43.6% reduction of pain and 22.7% reduction of functional disability in the follow-up at week 12 in the MFR group compared to the baseline. The proportion of responders, defined as participants who had at least a 50% reduction in pain between weeks 1 and 8, was 73% in the MFR group and 0% in the control group, which was 0% for functional disability in the MFR and control group. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that MFR when used as an adjunct to SBE is more effective than a control intervention for CLBP in nursing professionals.
机译:目的:与接受假肌筋膜释放(SMFR)的假手术组相比,肌筋膜释放(MFR)作为特定的背部锻炼(SBE)的辅助措施是否能减轻慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的疼痛和残疾。护理专业人士进行背部练习(SBE)。设计:随机,对照,单盲试验。地点:印度喀拉拉邦的非营利研究基金会诊所。参与者:慢性腰背痛(CLBP)的护理专业人员(N = 80)。干预措施:MFR组或对照组。该技术由经MFR认证的物理治疗师进行管理,每位客户在8周内进行24次治疗。主要结局指标:麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)用于评估主观疼痛经历,魁北克背痛残疾量表(QBPDS)用于评估与CLBP相关的残疾。主要结局指标是随机分组后第1周(测试前评分),第8周(测试后评分)和随访12周之间的MPQ和QBPDS评分之间的差异。结果:简单的主效应分析表明,MFR组在第8周和第12周的表现优于对照组(P <0.005)。如第8周的MPQ和QBPDS评分所示,MFR组患者的疼痛减轻了53.3%,功能障碍减少了29.7%,而对照组患者报告了MPQ减少了26.1%和9.8%。和第8周的QBPDS评分,与基线相比,MFR组在第12周的随访中疼痛持续减少了43.6%,功能残疾减少了22.7%。定义为在第1周到第8周之间疼痛至少减轻50%的参与者的响应者比例在MFR组中为73%,在对照组中为0%,在MFR和B中功能障碍为0%。控制组。结论:这项研究提供了证据,证明MFR作为SBE的辅助手段比护理专业人员中CLBP的对照干预更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号