首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Randomized, controlled trial to improve self-care in patients with heart failure living in rural areas
【24h】

Randomized, controlled trial to improve self-care in patients with heart failure living in rural areas

机译:改善农村地区心力衰竭患者自我保健的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND-: Patients with heart failure (HF) who live in rural areas have less access to cardiac services than patients in urban areas. We conducted a randomized, clinical trial to determine the impact of an educational intervention on the composite end point of HF rehospitalization and cardiac death in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS-: Patients (n=602; age, 66±13 years; 41% female; 51% with systolic HF) were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: control (usual care), Fluid Watchers LITE, or Fluid Watchers PLUS. Both intervention groups included a face-to-face education session delivered by a nurse focusing on self-care. The LITE group received 2 follow-up phone calls, whereas the PLUS group received biweekly calls (mean, 5.3±3.6; range, 1-19) until the nurse judged the patient to be adequately trained. Over 2 years of follow-up, 35% of patients (n=211) experienced cardiac death or hospitalization for HF, with no difference among the 3 groups in the proportion who experienced the combined clinical outcome (P=0.06). Although patients in the LITE group had reduced cardiac mortality compared with patients in the control group over the 2 years of follow-up (7.5% and 17.7%, respectively; P=0.003), there was no significant difference in cardiac mortality between patients in the PLUS group and the control group. CONCLUSIONS-: A face-to-face education intervention did not significantly decrease the combined end point of cardiac death or hospitalization for HF. Increasing the number of contacts between the patient and nurse did not significantly improve outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00415545.
机译:背景:生活在农村地区的心力衰竭(HF)患者获得的心脏服务少于城市地区的患者。我们进行了一项随机临床试验,以确定教育干预对该人群HF再住院和心源性死亡的复合终点的影响。方法和结果:患者(n = 602;年龄66±13岁;女性41%;收缩期HF 51%)随机分为3组:对照组(常规护理),Fluid Watchers LITE或Fluid Watchers PLUS 1组。这两个干预小组都包括一名护士,以自我保健为重点进行面对面的教育。 LITE组收到了2次随访电话,而PLUS组收到了每两周一次的电话(平均5.3±3.6;范围1-19),直到护士判断患者接受了适当的训练。在2年的随访中,有35%(n = 211)的患者因心力衰竭或心衰住院治疗,三组的合并临床结局比例无差异(P = 0.06)。尽管在随访的2年中,LITE组患者的心脏死亡率低于对照组(分别为7.5%和17.7%; P = 0.003),但在2年间,两组患者的心脏死亡率无显着差异。 PLUS组和对照组。结论-:面对面的教育干预并未显着降低心源性死亡或心衰住院的合并终点。增加患者与护士之间的联系数量并不能显着改善预后。临床试验注册-:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00415545。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号