...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: disease profiles and clinical courses of the 3 main types.
【24h】

Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: disease profiles and clinical courses of the 3 main types.

机译:全身性心脏淀粉样蛋白:3种主要类型的疾病谱和临床病程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Most studies of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy consider as a single entity the 3 main systemic cardiac amyloidoses: acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light-chain (AL); hereditary, mutated transthyretin-related (ATTRm); and wild-type transthyretin-related (ATTRwt). In this study, we compared the diagnostic/clinical profiles of these 3 types of systemic cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a longitudinal study of 233 patients with clear-cut diagnosis by type of cardiac amyloidosis (AL, n=157; ATTRm, n=61; ATTRwt, n=15) at 2 large Italian centers providing coordinated amyloidosis diagnosis/management facilities since 1990. Average age at diagnosis was higher in AL than in ATTRm patients; all ATTRwt patients except 1 were elderly men. At diagnosis, mean left ventricular wall thickness was higher in ATTRwt than in ATTRm and AL. Left ventricular ejection fraction was moderately depressed in ATTRwt but not in AL or ATTRm. ATTRm patients less often displayed low QRS voltage (25% versus 60% in AL; P<0.0001) or low voltage-to-mass ratio (1.1+/-0.5 versus 0.9+/-0.5; P<0.0001). AL patients appeared to have greater hemodynamic impairment. On multivariate analysis, ATTRm was a strongly favorable predictor of survival, and ATTRwt predicted freedom from major cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: AL, ATTRm, and ATTRwt should be considered 3 different cardiac diseases, probably characterized by different pathophysiological substrates and courses. Awareness of the diversity underlying the cardiac amyloidosis label is important on several levels, ranging from disease classification to diagnosis and clinical management.
机译:背景:大多数淀粉样变性心肌病的研究都将3种主要的全身性心脏淀粉样变性视为一个整体:获得性单克隆免疫球蛋白轻链(AL);单抗。遗传性,突变的甲状腺素相关基因(ATTRm);和野生型甲状腺素相关蛋白(ATTRwt)。在这项研究中,我们比较了这3种类型的系统性心脏淀粉样变性的诊断/临床特征。方法和结果:我们在2个意大利大型中心对233例按心脏淀粉样变性类型明确诊断的患者进行了纵向研究(AL,n = 157; ATTRm,n = 61; ATTRwt,n = 15)。 /管理机构自1990年以来。AL的平均诊断年龄高于ATTRm的患者。除1名外,所有ATTRwt患者均为老年男性。诊断时,ATTRwt的平均左心室壁厚高于ATTRm和AL。 ATTRwt中左心室射血分数适度降低,而AL或ATTRm中则没有。 ATTRm患者较少出现低QRS电压(25%vs AL,60%; P <0.0001)或低电压质量比(1.1 +/- 0.5 vs 0.9 +/- 0.5; P <0.0001)。 AL患者似乎有更大的血液动力学障碍。在多变量分析中,ATTRm是存活率的非常有利的预测指标,而ATTRwt则可以预测没有发生重大心脏事件。结论:AL,ATTRm和ATTRwt应该被认为是3种不同的心脏病,可能以不同的病理生理底物和病程为特征。从疾病分类到诊断和临床管理的各个层面,了解心脏淀粉样变性病标签潜在多样性的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号